User talk:Dolphinseeds

This is Dolphinseeds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON—unclear if this meets WP:NEVENT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 Hathras gang rape and murder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 Hathras gang rape and murder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 03:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dolphinseeds! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t · c) buidhe 03:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is now a sock puppet account[edit]

@Dreamy Jazz: I am not the sock puppet that you claimed. I am not associated with any editor. Secondly, in my credits I have ONLY edited 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article on Wikipedia so far. During the editing of 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article, every editor corrected my editing and I corrected them too including all the involved editors. Every discussion is resolved on the talk page. Dolphinseeds (talk) 15:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to contest this, you may request an unblock. To do this you can use the template {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dolphinseeds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have ONLY edited 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article on Wikipedia so far. During the editing of 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article, every editor corrected my editing and I corrected them too including all the involved editors. I am not the sock puppet, similarly I dont have multiple accounts. Dolphinseeds (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to address the specific concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BabbarJatt/Archive. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have fixed the formatting of the request to ensure it is listed as an unblock request. This will be reviewed by an uninvolved administrator. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz:@Yamla:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dolphinseeds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am addressing the specific concerns raised, refer all the details.

1. I have ONLY edited 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article on Wikipedia so far. During the editing of 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article, every editor corrected my editing and I corrected them too including all the involved editors. I am not the sock puppet, similarly I dont have multiple accounts.

2. I mentioned my editing with citations here, but this particular editor removed and stated it as a POV Is that a Policy of Wikipedia to remove edits with citations and state that whole part as a POV? That too without any discussion.

3. Again I edited it with better citations my 3 edits were removed - First edit, Second edit, Third edit . Now my cited edits were removed Is not that a POV? Do you think it's correct?

4. I initiated a discussion on the Talk page on 8th October 2020 and my draft was edited and resolved on 12 October 2020. If you are a responsible administrator, do you think it is wrong to discuss and resolve the draft?

5. Here on that Editors Talk page I initiated the discussion. That editor stated "Resolved". Is that wrong to discuss and resolve the draft? I initiated a discussion on the Talk page and my draft was edited and resolved You may refer here, how it was resolved

6. This is my first article editing and I dont have multiple accounts that you have claimed. I can not comment on other editors editing. If you are referring to this editor's editing, I am not associated with this article, I have not ever edited this article. I have ONLY edited 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article on Wikipedia so far]. Here is my editing history . I have only edited 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder article on Wikipedia. Is that wrong on Wikipedia to edit a single article?

7. If you are a responsible administrator, do you support above continuous removal of cited editing? Do you support the POV statements raised on my editing when every edits were well cited. Do you oppose how the POV was resolved? Dolphinseeds (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure exactly what point you're trying to make. You weren't blocked for anything that happened in that article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By ignoring the actual reason behind the block, which is sockpuppetry, and focusing on your edits about a single article, you are clearly attempting to obfuscate just like you were doing with your earlier account. Together with all that, it is completely undeniable that this is clearly not your first account. You should appeal from your main account. Srijanx22 (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz:@Yamla:I could not hear anything on raised questions. Isn't that a POV by above editor? I am not involved in any other article.Dolphinseeds (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that you have still not addressed the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BabbarJatt/Archive. Another admin will be along eventually to review your unblock request, though I do not support unblocking this account. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:I have addressed all the concerns that you have raised. Did you read all the above concerns that I have raised and answered? As an responsible administrator your are really here to support new editors? Dolphinseeds (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.