User talk:Don Quixote is awesome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thx from Derbyshire[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Don Quixote is awesome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! , sorry if I mistook your edits for vandalalism ... my error entirely Victuallers (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

Thanks for adding infoboxes to Plymouth articles. Keep up that good work! Jolly Ω Janner 18:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Thanks for reverting the irrelevant question on my talk page. Regards, Schumi555 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Props[edit]

Stunning user page, dude! Cheers. MekQuarrie (talk) 12:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kerplunk (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image update[edit]

Hi! I've been replacing an older image of mine with an updated one on various wiki's, IE:- File:Huddersfield Railway Station.jpg, following some redevelopment work to St Georges Square at the station entrance. I noted a wikicommons link showing that you have a copy of it on your user page, so I thought you may like a link to the replacement image:- File:Huddersfield Railway Station (RLH).jpg. :) Richard Harvey (talk) 09:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palisades[edit]

Hi. Just thought I'd pop by and just give you a quick mention that in the section about what shopping centres you've been to, you've mis-spelt the Palisades in Birmingham, it's Pallasades, just thought I'd let you know. But considering I'm here now, hi, *waves* BlueStars83 (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peak Village has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy(talk to me) 14:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Don Quixote is awesome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

"Howdy partner" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Howdy partner. Since you had some involvement with the Howdy partner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dalston Junction tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 24 § Dalston Junction tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Canonbury tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 24 § Canonbury tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Anerley tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 24 § Anerley tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Gospel Oak Underground station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 25 § Gospel Oak Underground station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Brockley tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 25 § Brockley tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Camden Road tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 26 § Camden Road tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 02:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]