User talk:DonaldGA4334484

2002 South Carolina Attorney General election moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to 2002 South Carolina Attorney General election. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DonaldGA4334484, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Va gov 2009[edit]

Can you add precient results for va governor 2009 Jm33746 (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to find data for it DonaldGA4334484 (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1994 Georgia Attorney General Election (April 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1994 Georgia Attorney General Election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DonaldGA4334484! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2006 Georgia state elections, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mark Taylor and David Burgess. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Fenetrejones per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fenetrejones. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 10:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DonaldGA4334484 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have any relation to "fenetrejones". I only have one account on Wikipedia and it's this one. I believe you all have made a mistake. Check the IP Address to make sure DonaldGA4334484 (talk) 22:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It could very well be that you don't have any other accounts, but that would only make this meat puppetry, which is treated the same. If you have no other accounts, you will still need to explain how your behavior matches that of the other user. Checkusers do not do "IP checks" in this situation, per WP:CHECKUSER; "On some Wikimedia projects, an editor's IP addresses may be checked upon their request, typically to prove innocence against a sockpuppet allegation. Such checks are not allowed on the English Wikipedia and such requests will not be granted." 331dot (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DonaldGA4334484 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the user of "fenetrejones" or @MillerStanIL(Twitter) asked me on Twitter to edit a few pages of Florida politicians adding information about their personal lifes and their religion.There was no reasoning added when "Curbon8" removed the information.I didn't know his account was blocked from editing and I should have considered that before I made the edits to a couple of these pages. I only make Wikipedia style election maps.

Decline reason:

Yeap, that means you have indeed violated WP:SOCK and the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Fenetrejones per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fenetrejones. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]