User talk:Doughbo
Deletion discussion about Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness[edit]
Hello, Doughbo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TheLongTone (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Ernest Rutherford GA review on hold[edit]
Hi Doughbo. I've started reviewing Ernest Rutherford, and have put it on hold for the moment. See Talk:Ernest Rutherford/GA1 for more details. Essentially I have paused the review before conducting the wider reading aspects of the review in order for the issues regarding sourcing, prose, and focus to be dealt with. Always happy to talk about the best way forward. SilkTork (talk) 11:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again. I've closed the review as suggested. I will help out where I can on preparing for a future GAN. SilkTork (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Doughbo! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! SilkTork (talk) 08:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Requested GOCE copy edit of Ernest Rutherford[edit]
 | Hello, Doughbo. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ernest Rutherford at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 04:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |