User talk:Douglas1690

Doouglas1690 talk page

Glasgow Rangers[edit]

Id like to see the Gers page changed to GLASGOW RANGERS to avoid fcomfusion. Douglas1690 (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monday june 1 = I worked for 55 mins. WOuld like to know were do I clock in and how much it is exactly that we all get. I know its no much but I just wanted to help. I not doing it for the money. I love Rangers. WATP

Douglas1690 (talk) 01:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Douglas1690, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rockpocket 02:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

I feel like a am being bullied cos am new, by celtic and dundee unt fans because they know that I am a gers man. My article has a banner on it, and I feel like there all grumpy and tryiong to scare me off. What can I do? I am doing this cos I love the gers and I want to stop the spam from celtic fans, but IO feel like am being bulied......

Even they make sarcastic things like "we're glad your here" aye, right! then they say I dont have referenses on my articles.

Douglas1690 (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume Dexter Peeps is the article, right? You're not being bulled, but it's more of that's not the type of material we desperately need. But tags aren't new either, as some of the articles I've created were tagged, and I'm not new. Articles are tagged here everyday, whether you like it or now. And what is that source? BoL (Talk) 00:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And as for the references, they are usually links. If it's a book, it has to be real. BoL (Talk) 00:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion[edit]

Please don't add your personal opinion to articles. Its important that our content is both neutral in tone and verifiable by reliable sources. By the way, you don't need to clock in because we don't get paid. Rockpocket 02:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dexter "Chippy" Peeps[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dexter "Chippy" Peeps, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter "Chippy" Peeps. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heyoo[edit]

Just thought i'd reply to your help desk comment: yes, this is voluntary. you dont get paid for editing here. Ironho lds 00:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thats fine I am doing this as I love the gers, am going to get my pal though! LOL windo Douglas1690 (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough then. The big tag "the free encyclopedia" on the front should really have been a hint :P. In regard to your userpage; "no fenians"? kind of offensive, you might want to take it down if you want to be taken seriously. and ditto with spelling "allowed" correctly. thanks.Ironho lds 00:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "no fenians aloud" from your user page. You're free to add it back, but I'd advise against it as it could be considered offensive. Racial/sectarian slurs are not really a good idea here. Enjoy editing! Fribbler (talk) 00:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it SAYS MY PAGE AND BE BOLD ! ! ! !! ! Douglas1690 (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesnt mean you can post whatever you want. And i wasnt being sarcastic or trying to be funny; similar with the "welcome" tag above which you took offence to, i was being serious. Ironho lds 00:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to quote the relevant material about offensive userpage content: "You do have more latitude in user space than elsewhere, but don't be inconsiderate. Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor." Ironho lds 00:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(after ec)(outdent) Be BOLD on editing articles, naturally; but your userpage should show your interests on wikipedia. And only that. Illustrating prejudice/racism/sectarianism will attract unwanted attention. That is, people will scrutinise every edit you make if you appear to be a racist/bigot. You don't want that attention. Imagine this is a job interview, in a way, it's best to say what you're good at, rather than stating prejudices...you wouldn't get the job then, would you? :-) Fribbler (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually in certain jobs in the West of Scotland, it probably would. But thats beside the point. Douglas1690. You are welcome to edit here, which is why I left that message, but please be aware that Wikipedia is not an extension of the Celtic/Rangers enmity. Here Old Firm fans work together, not against each other. So please leave the FTP nonsense at the door. Rockpocket 00:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dexter "Chippy" Peeps[edit]

I've closed this AFD as a delete. Please avoid creating unsourced articles in the future, as they may be seen as hoaxes and will be deleted. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 01:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]