User talk:Downtheroad35

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Downtheroad35, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 21:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Downtheroad35, saw your post on my talk. You are probably referring to Draft:Juice Beauty and this edit I did. Per general WP:AfC convention, you wrote a draft article, which generally gets submitted for review. I noticed you made a request to have the article moved into the mainspace, but the reason you don't have the move button is because you are not WP:AUTOCONFIRMed yet. My edit places your page in Category:Pending AfC submissions, so please be patient. An editor will come around to review your article for appropriate use of reliable sources, evaluate the subject's notability, etc, and make sure it's in line with Wikipedia's policies. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 21:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juice Beauty (October 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Even with sources, the lede paragraph consists of peacock language in the voice of Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juice Beauty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Downtheroad35, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juice Beauty (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

'Juice Beauty’s ingredients go beyond “natural.” ', in the voice of Wikipedia, is marketing buzz-speak.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juice Beauty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juice Beauty (December 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is simply a PR business listing, regardless if intended or not, and it's also clear there's nothing for notability in policy here; there's also no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else. Judging everything here, there would no be meaningful improvements in improving such a blatant advertisement if all that exists is exactly published or republished PR, regardless of anything or anyone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juice Beauty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Juice Beauty has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Juice Beauty. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Juice Beauty has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Juice Beauty. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]