User talk:Dr.Jhingaadey

Welcome!

Hello, Dr.Jhingaadey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please, read our initial guidelines and we'll really welcome your contributions. Please refrain from leaving large rants on the discussion pages. The discussion pages should be focused on specific problems with the articles with specific ideas to improve them. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

regarding talk page homeopathic[edit]

please i dunerstand your concerns regarding the favorable treatent regarding homeopathy on the Homeopathy article but oje thing that you need to be understanding is that Wikipedia is built off of concensus building and reliability. Consensus is currently not a friend to homeopathy right now and reliable sources are the ones published and vetted by the community and those do not tend to favor homeopathy overmuch either. If you want to hep the way is not to post rants onthe talk page of articles and lecture everybody but to find sources to back up pro-homeopathy claims and present them on the talk page to be discussed and anaylzed so that a clear decision to move forward with inclusion can be made. while a key part of oru policy is WP:BOLD there is still aconcensus building exercise that needs to be maintained and even disagreements such as homeopathy/allopathy needed to be regarded calmaly and with calmness. Thank you for your time Smith Jones (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homeopathy works![edit]

I was surfing the Net and was shocked to read the ‘article’ on Homeopathy. Effects should be good enough to accept that Homeopathy works. There is a Homeopathic remedy, "Nux Vomica", which in the 30th potency, taken thrice a day, can produce loose motion in anyone except the 'Constitutional' Nux Vomica Patient - this any one can try, to prove it works. Everybody has a natural healing ability within them. Conventional medicine (Allopathy) treats only the symptoms and gives only temporary relief by suppressing the symptoms. Disgusted with this form of treatment, a German Medical Doctor, Dr. Samuel Christian Friedrich Hahnemann, stopped Allopathic medication and after some research, started a new medical system, which he named Homoeopathy (most people now spell it Homeopathy). Homeopathy stimulates the natural healing processes of the body with the help of very minute quantities (i.e. in sub-atomic particles) of a remedy to bring about a natural remission of disease. It is not concerned with a physiological response.

Note: Homeopathy does not produce any side effects what so ever!

Homeopathic treatment is best taken from a Qualified Homeopathic Doctor because people who medicate themselves on their own or take treatment from a person who isn't Qualified, can go into a state of 'Drug Proving', i.e. they start showing the symptoms that drug produces when taken in milligram doses (remember Homeopathic remedies are not herbal, but sub-atomic, electromagnetic remedies), worse they may become immune to treatment by other Qualified Doctors (including Allopaths/Conventional Doctors).

If you have the time, please read the following:-

Removed text copied whole or in part from http://cure4incurables.com/homeo.htm

Thanking you, Yours faithfully, Dr.Jhingaadey

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Jhingaadey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't think I have posted anything that warrants my being blocked, but despite appealing to George Herbert Lambert, who blocked me, I continue to remain 'blocked indefinitely'. Please unblock me or at least tell me why I've been blocked and how to get 'unblocked'. Can I mention web-sites? If so, can I mention my own web-site? I have posted the matter that got me blocked above. Please tell me what is wrong with it

Decline reason:

You are blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user, and you do not appear to have anything of substance to contribute to this encyclopedia. — Sandstein (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please 'unblock' me![edit]

Dear Smith (Jones), Homeopathy works! For more proof/evidence, please visit & download the 'book (in .pdf format)', "Homeopathy: The scientific proofs of efficacy". The matter I posted was already long, so I didn't post matter from the guna.it web-site (I probably would have broken copyrights as well by doing so). I thought you guys were 'unbiased' and allowed a defence. Please 'unblock' me, so that I can defend myself. With Regards, Dr.Jhingaadey Web-site:

I'm new here, so please tell me if I can mention web-sites.

WP:SPAM. So, no, not in the way you're doing it. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, cut it out. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you were blocked bcause of scpamming, not because of your defense of homeopathyism. Smith Jones (talk) 15:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)