User talk:DrBruce 67

Welcome!

Hello, DrBruce 67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! andy 18:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:MarcoTolo may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Mschel 19:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He has just added EXACTLY the same to my page. You haven't written the same to him, so I can not take any notice of you. --DrBruce 67 19:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parkinsonism[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Parkinsonism. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- MarcoTolo 20:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very good reasons have been given for every deletion when deleted. They were remarkably weak or useless references. All other editors accepted them instead of reverting them. --DrBruce 67 20:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than slow-motion reversion to an unreferenced version, an alternative approach would be to find better references. -- MarcoTolo 20:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]