User talk:Draculvania

Hello, Draculvania. You have new messages at Noosentaal's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome!

Hello Draculvania, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 131.89.192.109 01:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page List of characters in the Castlevania series. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Noosentaal^·talk· 16:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are constructive. Your reverts are unconstructive. I am trying to be constructive and also follow NPOV. Essentially either Legends needs to be categorized under legends, for people trying to look up "Legends", or it needs to be linked back to the Castlevania: Legends article. Looking up "non-canon" is quite unclear since people looking up information on "legends" won't find it by looking up "non-canon". Legends is a better categorization heading. I even left an explanation in the talk page but people seemed to have ignored it. I don't appreciate your fanatic accusations.Draculvania (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The edits have removed extensive portions of sourced material and have been done in a rapid wave without explanations in the edit summary. I still have a great deal of difficulty in understanding the nuances of the changes you are making, but I will remove the warning I had left. Please be extremely careful to explain the purpose of all edits in edit summaries, and to be especially careful and detailed when deleting content (e.g., "removed material on X based on consensus at talk page"). Alansohn (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider my warning removed as well. See my talk page for my reply to your comments. Regards --Noosentaal^·talk· 16:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]