User talk:Drakemor

Drakemor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Drakemor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

These are no longer accurate to say far right. By continuing to do so is disruptive. Drakemor (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

We follow sources that meet WP:RS, basically mainstream sources. If you start changing the description of fascism from far right, that will be considered disruption. You've now been told that by two WP:Administrators. Doug Weller talk 16:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Exactly. That's how fascism works, by controlling mainstream propaganda. It's in the discription. If you only listen to one side you become a proprietor of fascism. Drakemor (talk) 16:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Also if you were to actually watch everything the political left has been doing. It's going by the definition of fascism verbatim. Drakemor (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia goes by the consensus of political science scholars over the past 90 years. Amateur and partisan opinions and misinformation campaigns aren't a basis for encyclopedia content. This has been extensively discussed and rejected. Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Well here's a short history lesson about what happens when you only listen to media propaganda. youtu.be/c1ts-XuVNtw Drakemor (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

All I'm asking is for the removal of the concrete far right explanation. It's ignorant to think that only one side can be any one thing. Drakemor (talk) 16:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

There's even a left wing fascism article, in wikipedia that does a better job at keeping it neutral than this. This title should be better categorized as right wing fascism, than fascism itself. Drakemor (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Since you decided to come to my talk page and comment on a section made by a silly person a few years ago here's some info. Actual researchers and the like who have been studying fascism for the best part of a century are in agreement with labelling Fascism as far-right. To change the article reflecting this agreement in the actual research YOU would have to provide MAJOR CITATIONS to the contrary of the article. Left-wing fascism is even more ill defined than fascism, due to left-wing fascism 1) not really being a thing, 2) being a term used by academics for various different things. So if you think you can expand that article it is greatly welcomed, and you are free to add a section to the main fascism article about it, if you can justify it with good external evidence from good sources. - Cdjp1 (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)