User talk:Dreamykyu

Welcome!

Hello, Dreamykyu, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing plans for "Katherine Hayles" page[edit]

Kyueun, your suggestions for editing the page look very good. I think you could add your sentence on "virtuality" ("In this regard, the posthuman subject under the condition of virtuality is an "amalgam, a collection of heterogeneous components, a material-informational entity whose boundaries undergo continuous construction and reconstruction"" (Hayles, 3)) to the page. From what I understand about Hayles' text, I think that sentence should go under the "embodiment and materiality" section, since it's describing the composition/boundaries of the posthuman body. What do you think? That sentence would fit well right after "Meanwhile, popular conceptions of the cybernetic posthuman imagine the body as merely a container for information and code."

I also agree that a sentence clarifying the difference between body/embodiment would be useful. Your quote, "In contrast to the body, embodiment is contextual, enmeshed within the specifics of place, time, physiology, and culture, which together compose enactment" (196), would go well at the very end of that paragraph. You could introduce the quote by saying something like: "Hayles traces the differences between "body" and "embodiment" in scientific discourse and science fiction. Here, she argues that "in contrast to the body, embodiment is contextual, enmeshed within the specifics of place, time, physiology, and culture, which together compose enactment" (196). Or something like that. What do you think?

I'm thinking of adding a few sentences about embodiment, mainly to clarify the distinction that you start to make. These sentences would go right after yours. What do you think about this addition: "Hayles specifically examines how various science fiction novels portray a shift in the conception of information, particularly in the dialectics of presence/absence toward pattern/randomness. In chapter 10 of her book, she diagrams these shifts to show how ideas about abstraction and information actually have a "local habitation" and are "embodied" within the narratives. Although ideas about "information" taken out of context creates abstractions about the human "body", reading science fiction situates these same ideas in "embodied" narrative."

Let me know what you think about all of this. Also I'm going to copy/paste this message on your talk page, which I don't fully understand but I think we are supposed to be communicating on there!

If you think it's okay, we should go ahead and make changes to the page!

-Filipa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gofilipa (talk • contribs) 20:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filipa, I'm finally here! I agree with your suggestion in the "virtuality" part and thank you for your clarification. I also thought that the quoted sentence would fit nicely in the "embodiment and materiality" section, but was not sure if I needed to continue the discussion of "the posthuman" as in the "human and posthuman" section. It would work well right after the sentence you quoted.

I am happy that you also agree on the need for clarification between the body and embodiment in Hayles's text. I like the sentence you wrote, and I think I can add the sentence with just one change. I will use "the concept of the body" instead of "body," to be consistent with Hayles's use of the term and to emphasize the construction of the concept of the body. So, we can add:

Hayles traces the differences between the concept of "the body" and "embodiment" in scientific discourse and science fiction. Here, she argues that "in contrast to the body, embodiment is contextual, enmeshed within the specifics of place, time, physiology, and culture, which together compose enactment." (Hayles 196)

I like your addition as it adds a more specific discussion. One question here is if you need to clarify the name of chapter 10 or not. What do you think? One minor comment is: changing creates -> create and moving the comma before "reading science fiction" into the quotation mark (?)

Let me know if you have ideas on how we can actually start editing!

Dreamykyu (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BOLD you should Be Bold! Jump in and start editing. --Theredproject (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the comment, I've just jumped in to the ocean of Wikipedia and done my first editing (wow! it feels amazing!). Instead of separating two sentences that I suggested, I added them at the end of the paragraph on "embodiment and materiality." As the last sentence of the paragraph ended not clearly explaning the material-informational relation in Hayles's conception of the posthuman subject, I think it would work better there (like a concluding remark of the previous sentences) Then I condensed my ideas and added a single sentence starting to differentiate embodiment from the body. Filipa, if you add your more detailed descriptions regarding embodiment after mine, it would be good! (Plus, a minor edit: to change "P"osthuman into "p"osthuman in the sentence on "human and posthuman." Dreamykyu (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will post our diff to the Theredproject talk page! Dreamykyu (talk) 20:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018[edit]

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: `@wikiwomeninred`

August and New Achievements at Women in Red[edit]

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90[edit]

An exciting new month for Women in Red!

August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!

For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April Events[edit]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117

Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events: