User talk:Drhansbaweja

April 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tomara dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 17:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mariam-uz-Zamani. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This accurate information Drhansbaweja (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mariam-uz-Zamani, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then please provide accurate source of information 🤬 18 CE. Drhansbaweja (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mariam-uz-Zamani.

The information provided in the article is cited with reliable sources. What you are doing is changing cited content, removing cited content, and adding such blatant misinformation as claiming that a 16th century princess belonged to dynasty which ended 2000 years earlier. Alivardi (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Come on putting information of author who put his personal point of view. He did mention place born & list her name. If you have then share with me. I am working than 10 year in field of Indian history from London. Drhansbaweja (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the information on Mariam-uz-zamani is agreed upon up on a large scale. The claims that you made are accepted on a very small scale. Although, no one can surely claim her real identity, it is probably best to give the most reliable information which have sources. I request you to please not make such changes anymore. Manavati (talk) 20:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Jagat_Gosain.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]