User talk:Dudleybus/2012-2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Have a look at this AfD[edit]

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 153 (2nd nomination), and leave your opinion there. Thank ye, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at this one too : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 394 (2nd nomination) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:Verify[edit]

Replacing a request for verification with "although some have now been transferred to GBRf" as you did here isn't what Template:fact means your edit. Please read wp:verify which is about the need to have all information verifyable.Imgaril (talk) 20:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Class 66[edit]

This links doesn't show anything .. it's a single fuzzy loco .. it hasn't even got a date on it. And it definately doesn't say anything about DRS have now returned 401-10 as they are high emission locos thus meaning they are the newest fleet set to reach storage which is what was tagged with Template:fact. The point of the [citation needed] thing is that the sentence(s) that come before it are being marked as needing a link to prove them.

Please don't remove them, without adding a proper link - like a publisher book or magazine. Thanks.Imgaril (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right: a) a link to the original image: [[1]]. b) This image was taken in MAY 2011 operating service ID 6z39 for GBRf. c) Platform 5 books (Locomotives, ISBN 978-1902-336-79-4) show 66401-66405 (page 53) as GBRT (explained on page 92 as GBRf Class 66 Porterbrook Spot-hire units.) It shows (page 58) 66406-66410 as renumbered 66841-66845. User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 21:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:TramWiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talkcontribs) 09:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Coventry edit-a-thon at Herbert Art Gallery and Museum, Coventry[edit]

Historic Coventry Edit-a-thon - You are invited!
The Herbert Art Gallery and Museum is hosting an edit-a-thon on Saturday 31 March 2012. 15 Wikimedians will have to learn more about "historic Coventry". The day will centre upon editing, however and we aim to improve the coverage of Coventry's illustrious history on Wikimedia projects. For more information and to sign up, see the event page. We hope you'll join us!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of GLAM/HAGAM at 20:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Historic Coventry edit-a-thon at Herbert Art Gallery and Museum, Coventry[edit]

Historic Coventry Edit-a-thon - You are invited!
The Herbert Art Gallery and Museum is hosting an edit-a-thon on Saturday 31 March 2012. 15 Wikimedians will have to learn more about "historic Coventry". The day will centre upon editing, however and we aim to improve the coverage of Coventry's illustrious history on Wikimedia projects. For more information and to sign up, see the event page. We hope you'll join us!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of GLAM/HAGAM at 20:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Tomsbus.[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Hey, Dudleybus. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Ramesh Ramaiah talk 16:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:West Midlands bus route 37 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sionk (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hanson's Local Buses for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanson's Local Buses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanson's Local Buses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Preston Bus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dudleybus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dudleybus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dudleybus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wright StreetLite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC) User:Dudleybus User talk:Dudleybus 16:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]