User talk:Dumpty-Humpty

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Egg-man+q-mark.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Egg-man+q-mark.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Your change to the non-free rationale probably won't fly. Non-free images (which includes fair use images) are not permitted on User pages at all, even if you are the one who created the image. Also, images that are only used on a user page are likely to be deleted as well. See Wikipedia:User_page#Images_on_user_pages and Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria. If you created the image and want to use it, you'll have to release it into the public domain (giving up any rights to the image) or release it under a free license from this page. If you do not want to release the image with a free license, I suggest leaving it off Wikipedia entirely.Dcmacnut (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The change absolutely won't fly; All user images uploaded to Wikipedia must be licensed so that they may be reused by anyone for anything. Restricting use to Wikipedia only makes an image absolutely unacceptable to Wikipedia. —teb728 t c 03:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

As to this image, I'm going to lift the copyright claim. TEB728 responded also in Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. I continue there with some more questions. Thanks. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 07:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

MD-11's handling notoriety

I don't know why anybody had a problem finding cites to ("verifying") the proposition that experts consider the MD-11 difficult to land; it's all over the Internet, e.g., the AP report in question. It's pretty well known in the large-aircraft community.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flag of Japan/archive2

I am glad to have a Japanese look at this article. Just for a point of reference, when an article is "stable", it means that there are no present edit wars and the content does not shift dramatically from one day to the next. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

However, I had people who opposed for not having information about the WW2 usage of the flag and demanded more, so I am not sure how that can be balanced. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmm.... We have to mention the WW2 usage, and we also should avoid going too far into the WW2 history. I will make a reply on the FAC page. Thanks. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 14:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you take a look at http://www.pref.nara.jp/somu-so/jourei/reiki_honbun/k4010086001.html ? User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I also spoke to RangerSmith, who wanted a lot of the WW2 information. I am just wondering if I addressed everything you talked about or is there more that needs to be done? User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 23:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The article is being copyedited, but I wonder if there is anything else that needs to be done. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 02:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revert

Google Books does work for me and works for others (I just ran a link check) but they might not be available for those outside the USA. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 09:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe accesses from a particular country are screened out due to a copyright problem. Anyway, to avoid full protection of this article and prevent a cooperative editor like you from being blocked, we'd better refrain from reverting unless the affected part lacks reliable sources or includes errors.

This article seems to have many to be improved or modified. I'm getting busy, but I hope this article will be bettered while I'm not engaged in editing it.

Thanks. --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 11:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

• • We are not in an edit war, so we are fine. There is also no danger for the article to be locked. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 17:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dumpty-Humpty. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dumpty-Humpty~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dumpty-Humpty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)