User talk:Dunkadelic Education

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Dunkadelic Education! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Kukini 17:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi!

I've noticed that you've made several new articles regarding "Dunkadelic", such as The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present, Dunkadelicious and Dunkadelic (which was transwikied from Wiktionary to Wikipedia). All these articles are unsourced, unencyclopedic, and as far as I can tell is a attempt at using Wikipedia for advertising. I urge you to stop, or I'm forced to contact an administrator. --Eivind^t@c 23:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Calton | Talk 23:45, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 00:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present

I've nominated the article The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present. Don't forget to add four tildes (˜˜˜˜) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Calton | Talk 05:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The "Dunkadelic Era" In America will be part of this cultures history. I've been invited to high schools around the Maryland area to talk about this subject. If you delete this article you will erasing history from a culture that is always defined as negative I would appreciate your support and expertise to make it better for everyone. I'm not getting paid for this it's history and I want my culture told by people from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunkadelic Education (talk • contribs) 23:21, 21 May 2006, from Talk:The "Dunkadelic Era" In America, 1984-Present

Look, Mr. Vaughn, we're not here to act as your PR vehicle. You want to sell fashion; fine, have at it, but don't try characterizing your commercial motivations as some sort of noble crusade. And I don't buy for second the notion that you are uniquely qualified to write about this aspect of popular culture, but if you really want to contribute, if you really are sincere about being truthful and real, then look over and improve the existing articles (start from, say Hip-hop, and work your way around) and not carving out your own personal essays. --Calton | Talk 00:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)