User talk:Duosdebs01

Joe Moler moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Joe Moler, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 21:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

I edted article Draft:Joe Moler and i request it to preview. I invite you to preview it.

Duosdebs01 (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, having another look at it, I don't see how the subject is notable. There are minimal reliable sources, and the whole draft is written with a WP:POV. If I were to review the draft now, I would decline it - however, in case others have different thoughts, I will let it sit for you to improve in the meantime. Silikonz💬 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

what i need to add on draft to be transformed in page?

Greetings, Duosdebs01 (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't Google Translate entire sources and copy-paste the content onto the draft. If you are not proficient in English, I recommend you to go to another Wikipedia. Silikonz💬 18:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

Is that all i need to do for transformation from draft to page?

Greetings, Duosdebs01 (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

I update page, i add more sources and more information. I request it to article status, preview it.

Greetings, Duosdebs01 Duosdebs01 (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to ping me when you want the draft reviewed. As stated in the notice, reviewers will go to your draft when ready. Silikonz💬 21:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

I want you to preview it now. Duosdebs01 (talk) 21:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Silikonz,

Do i need to add something on draft Joe Moler?

Greetings, 20:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

February 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Silikonz💬 03:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duosdebs01. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. Silikonz💬 16:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Moler (March 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Silikonz were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Numerous sources are unreliable interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Moler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Silikonz💬 18:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duosdebs01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Silikonz💬 18:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Moler (July 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Profile pages on institutions that the subject belongs to, promotional pieces, self published contents and interviews can not be used to establish a person's notability for Wikipedia. It is required to have multiple significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. The subject fails WP:NBIO with the currently cites sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Moler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Moler (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No relevant improvements since the last decline and nothing suggests the subject can meet the notability criteria.

S0091 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]