User talk:DustyRain/Archive 3

Help Me Section[edit]

{{helpme}} For software comparison articles, what is the policy for inclusion? For example, if "company A" has a Wiki article, "company B" is redlined (no article), "company c" is an external link and "company D" is text (no article, not linked), what organizations should be included ? What edits are required? - Thanks in advance - DustyRain (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If only one of them has an article, then I'd say no, don't bother with a comparison. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} For comparisons involving many companies where majority have an article... (see above) - DustyRain (talk) 20:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that those are generally acceptable so long as they are sourced and neutral in tone. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me Question[edit]

I am trying to put up a neutral page on a company and it keeps getting taken down no matter what I call the page. Can you help?

Take a look at WP:CORP and WP:FAQ/Business. What is the name of the article? Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 19:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Data conferencing[edit]

Hi DustyRain, the 'see also' link you added to Data conferencing‎ is already listed in the template on the bottom of the page. Just wanted to let you know. :) - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Concerns[edit]

Hi DustyRain, I added COI tag to Axisoft, the only contributer is Axisoft.gadw (talk). Just wanted to let you know. - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 15:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DustyRain, I am not familiar with notability of company articles. There was today another newly created account working on the Axisoft article. Maybe it is worthwhile to check if this company fulfils the notability criterias. - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:direct[edit]

Seems to have solved itself. For future reference, redirects always take the form

#REDIRECT [[nameofarticlehere]]

as the first line in the article. That's all there is to it :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 23:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of web conferencing software[edit]

Is there any particular reason you asked me for my opinion? I'm not at all an expert on the subject, so I'm afraid my opinion would mean very little. With just the one link and without any references that explicitly address the points being discussed, it does seem like original research. (For the record, I do believe software comparisons can make solid article topics). - Mgm|^(talk) 08:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- I noticed you had deleted similar articles so I thought you might be interested in the subject. - No worries, have a good day. DustyRain (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I delete loads of stuff on almost a daily basis. Doesn't mean I'm interested in it. :) In this particular case, I would recommend taking it to AFD. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zoho Office Suite[edit]

Yes, you performed the process correctly, but I'm afraid I don't agree with the nomination (even before DGG worked on it). The article listed several reliable references. I believe the correct course of action would be to send this to some Cleanup project or WikiProject, because it was obvious salvageable. Still, I applaud you for using extensive reasoning and encourage you to keep doing so. Too many people say "Non-notable, delete" without providing any reason why that I spend more time dragging information out of people than actually discuss the article. Don't make the same mistake. -- Mgm|^(talk) 08:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You said in your edit summary: "I need to figure out how to talk messages are posted so parties are aware of previous replies and are notified of posts" Some users choose to have the discussion in a single location and use the {{talkback}} template to inform the other person they replied. But you're right. It's a weak point. Wikipedia software is optimized for article writing, not discussion. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks - I'll checkout the talkback template, I had bumped into it before but forgot about it. - Cheers - DustyRain (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]