Hi. A very good question. Unless otherwise stated, records are inscriptions on stone or copper plates. They can however take poetic forms and even become literary like in composition, even though they are inscriptions. Examples are the Aihole record (in a Jain temple) of court poet Ravi Kirti, an eulogy of king Pulakesi II. The earliest extant Kannada poetry is the Kappe Arabhatta record which is poetry on stone.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 15:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006[edit]
The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This topic, was a sub article attached to the main "Chalukya Dynasty" page. I have been working on it in the background with an intention to bring it to main article status. Is that allowed. I mean, will the fact that "Chalukya dynasty" became a FA prevent another article on their descendents (bearing the same name) from becoming a FA? I intend to travel to some of their finest monuments in central Karnataka (recently declared national monuments) to learn more about their architecture (a bridge between Badami Chalukya and Hoysala) just for this purpose.Their contribution to South India and Kannada in particular is too vast to be left aside as a sub page.Dineshkannambadi 00:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I received some candid critisism from user Tony. I have taken his advice and severely delinked the page of repeat links. He was also against Chronological links and I have removed both year and century links, even from the Infobox for kings and reworded the Lead and Architecture somewhat. I will take a closer look at the whole page tommorow again and remove sweeping statements. Please take a look.Dineshkannambadi 03:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will be trying to add some material over the next two days. I have already added a page on Bharatchandra Ray. -- P.K.Niyogi 18:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I have requested Ambuj. I believe as far as I could understand Tony's comments, I have sincerely tried to address his concerns. I dont think he had any issues with the structure, format, content etc. His concerns were the adjectives, excessive linking which has been addressed.ThanksDineshkannambadi 20:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. What happens if User:Tony remains busy for the foreseeable future. Does his comment remain "object"? Just concerned a bit.Thanks.Dineshkannambadi 15:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, if necessary I can take screenshots of the film and upload them onto Wiki. Do you know the policy for using such shots? Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 05:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding on Tamil people: wrt Hippocrates, unless someone else takes over the article, I don't hold out much hope for the article improving. My sense is that Rmrfstar uses WP:FAC in place of WP:PR. Sandy (Talk) 18:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I want to thank you for the many efforts to help me bring this article to a better "world view" (irrespective of the outcome of FAC). It is this moral support that keeps History buffs like me chugging along. Thanks again.Dineshkannambadi 14:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am slowly taking a look at Baul. Due to the depth of the subject matter, I expect it to take a while. In any case, the main bottleneck in the end will be pics. If you can find some pics of Calcuttan Bauls, that would help a lot. Cheers! --ppm 02:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Its greate that you are keeping watch on 'Kolkata' and 'Delhi'. You reverted back to the previous changes.
What I think is that there should be one large picture at start of the article which reflects the identity of that city. That was the reason I enlarged and moved 'Haowara bridge' and 'lotus tample' pics. If you think so please revert it back.
While it is possible to merge "Humorism" and "Crisis", it's not a good idea, especially considering that Humorism is a summary of Humorism. Similarly, merging "Vis medicatrix naturae" would make the article harder to read and understand while not improving it in any way I can see. Indeed, WP:MOS says "Be generous in adding sub-headings. They help readers to get an overview of the article and to find subtopics of interest." -- Rmrfstar 17:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That merge is good work, but I still find the result unreadable for its unbroken length. And while the sections aren't particularly "fleshy", I don't think they can be expanded much. -- Rmrfstar 17:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Ok I will take a look at it. Yes I have put in over 4 months work on Vijayanagar Empire and Western Chalukyas. While I have travelled to only 2 well known Western Chalukya temples, I believe I have enoguh images to make it look colorful.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 17:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also should not forget Hoysala architecture. Having travelled to and photographed over 15 Hoysala temples in South Karnataka and read up on it from books written by architecture experts, I think I have put together a decent amount of information on the basics of their architecture and also feel confident that I understand the basics at an ametuer level.This is a new topic and may bring some interesting suggestions from reviewers.Dineshkannambadi 21:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is indeed a great pleasure for all of us to see your praiseworthy contributions, specially in articles related to India. But why you are against inclusion of list of luminaries? I dont understand at all. Dont you feel that Kolkata's fame was somehow related to these personalities action and reaction in the arena of history to a marked extent?
There is an alternative thought poping up in my mind. Is that true that you moved against this list only after inclusion of some muslim names like Nazrul & Suhrawrdy? If that is true I feel ashamed. Because I still like to thing Calcuttans to be proud of their secular epitome. Kolkata indeed is the most secular and progessive place in whole of India.
Thanks a lot once again for being so supportive to wikipedia. And please pardon me if I am wrong in my assumptions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.84.38.246 (talk) 06:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Would u kindly take a look at the template Bengal_film}} that someone keeps inserting in the Ray article? I am concerned that a template with all kinds of dubious fair use images is unjustified, and its a huge template anyway.--ppm 10:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dwaipayan, sorry for not getting back earlier. I was on xmas vacation! Great job with Delhi. I will try to contribute whatever little I can. Hope its gets to FA fast! — Lost(talk) 11:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your objection to the featured article candidacy of Paulins Kill is specious for reasons I have stated in my reply here as my citations are well without the bounds of WP:CITE, WP:RS and WP:V. As the reasons behind your objection are wholly without merit, I respectfully request that you rescind your objection. —ExplorerCDT 18:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
a mere 4 out of 68 citations needed fixing. not the "many" that you stated. now, I ask again, rescind your objection. —ExplorerCDT 02:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now, User:Ruhrfisch decided to do what you wished with the article, so the conditions of your conditional objection have been met. I have no intention of reverting his changes. —ExplorerCDT 17:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was gone for about a month on vacation... now I am back. Happy Holidays! Antorjal 23:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am now convinced with your position to remove the list of luminaries of Calcutta[edit]
Dear Dwaipayanc:
Yes, I am now somehow convinced of your position. I would not insist on keeping the list of luminaries of Calcutta.
I stiil think Calcutta to be the most secular place in whole of India.That's my believe. Since I know that the objectivity of this may be questioned, that's why I did not put it into the main article. I just communicated my believe to you in the talk page.
About the user name, I can only tell you I have yet not decided to stay here permanently. The moment I decide for staying, I promise I'll take a user name.
Thank you for your sincere detailed clarifications —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.84.38.246 (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Dear Dwaipayanc, New Year is the time to enjoy, party and rejuvenate oneself with a new spirit and enthusiasm. It is also the time to forget the past and begin a new life. Let us make the New Year’s resolution to:
Create a feeling of brotherhood with all Wikipedians and everybody on this Earth.
I take this as an occasion to wish you and your family the best in the days to come on Wikipedia and in real life. May this New Year invigorate you, bringing you more happiness and content. Happy New Year 2007!!! and Happy Wikipediaing -- Amartyabag (Talk) 16:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)|}[reply]
Hi. Happy new year yo you. User:deeptrivia showed interest in collaborating and bringing this article to FA. I have taken care of the basic clean up (though much more is left in the form of flowing prose, excessive linking etc). Shall I first nominate for Peer review so we can dive in and start working on the article (assuming you are free), or do you want us to work on this first, clean it up and then submit for peer review?thanks.Dineshkannambadi 16:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Let me start by wishing you a happy new year. In December, I tried to make a trip to Darjeeling. But that did not materialize even this time :( Instead I spent two days at Ghoom. I got information regarding the ghoom monastery and the japanese peace pagoda in darjeeling (and a few bits here and there as well). But currently I am on a 56K connection, can't upload them. Once I get back to coll (thats on Jan 8), I will summarize everything in a blog (with sources), upload the photos to flickr and give you the link to both. You can then use the info the way you like to and upload the pictures that you want directly from flickr or tell me which ones you want and I will upload them. Regards, and have a great year ahead. :) --soumসৌমোyasch 18:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Agartala gi1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006[edit]
The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]
Hey, what are the plans u have in ur mind for the West Bengal Wikiproject? Which articles should be formatted to make them FA? I think its about one month since a article have achieved FA status? According to be Netaji , Mother Teresa have the potential to make a FA? Let me know ur decisions? Bye-- Amartyabag (Talk) 11:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey.. I seriously feel that there is no point in pushing this article for FA status unless there is a clear distinction between articles on NCT and Delhi. I would have loved to contribute but I am hard-pressed for time nowadays. --Incman|वार्ता 23:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All cellular providers are present including reliance and tata, but I see you've already added that — Lost(talk) 14:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited and expanded the Plot section of Aparajito, changing the original version you have written. If you would be so kind, could you let me know whether this edit is OK with you? If not, I will revert back to your original version. Dhannabaad, mahaashay! --Kuaichik 05:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you again! Hmm, I don't know about any one Ray film...I think several of his films are quite similar in complexity (especially everything from Pather Panchali to Kanchenjungha in chronological order).
If there were one article I would try to (eventually) nominate for FA status, it would probably be the article on Ankur that I created. --Kuaichik 08:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh...aachha...well, I'll see what I can do about that, although I normally focus on plot (as far as movies are concerned) and I'm not sure how much information on production is available. In that respect, it would definitely be much easier to have Pather Panchali run for FA status (considering the amount of information available on SatyajitRay.org about the production) :-P --Kuaichik 09:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aquatica is situated in village Kochpukur under Rajarhat Police Station,far away from Salt Lake.Therefore it was removed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitsanyal (talk • contribs)
I just had a thought: if Pather Panchali is to be run for FA status, shouldn't we probably change the sentence that says "...this indicates the extent of the first film's cultural impact" ? If so, I'm not quite sure how it should be changed. Perhaps we could say something more detailed there: maybe some information about how many theaters featured it internationally, how much money Ray earned from it (or, if he actually didn't earn much, how much time it took him to get the Government of West Bengal to fund his films before and after Pather Panchali), and how much longer (and/or how many more times) he had to rely on government funds for making more films.
We could probably mention (if there is a source to support this claim, which I'm currently guessing there is) that it is still played on television in West Bengal along with some of his other films. Anyway, I plan to make some more changes to the Pather Panchali article and then perhaps to Aparajito before translating the latter article into Spanish (which was my original, er, objective!). --Kuaichik 01:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I suspect the "Critical Reception" section needs quite a bit of improvement. I don't know of a single FA that talks of a film's critical acclaim just by quoting from a bunch of critics and citing the sources. More detail, I think, would be needed for an FA. Once again, anek dhannabaad! --Kuaichik 01:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Congratulations: Hippocrates is a Featured Article. Thanks so much for all of your help on the FAC page! -- Rmrfstar 22:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As of a few moments ago, Paulins Kill was promoted to Featured Article status. I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to and suggestions for improving the article over these past few months and that I appreciate your help in bringing this article to notice as a Featured Article. Once again, thank you, and keep up the good work. —ExplorerCDT 22:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with Blacksun. I don't think I can help—I'm not from North India and don't know much about its culture (South India is a very different matter). I hope you're able to fix the issues soon, though. Thanks. Saravask 05:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What the culture section needs is just the photographs of the historical places mentioned there in the content. Rest I think is fine, Some red links are to be filled and it needs to be classified properly. Sushant gupta 05:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some changes has been made. Do see it. One more thing, yes exactly what said a, collage yes a collage is required, that I'll see. Thanks for the suggestion. Sushant gupta 06:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Ahhh... I will try to write the articles mentioned there as the subheadings within a week or more. Fine, Now take a look at this. Sushant gupta 06:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But it is the logo for Delhi tourism.
Hi Dwaipayan! We need a Delhiite to tackle the culture section. We can start by improving the prose, removing the subheaders and keeping it in paragraphs? I'll try a bit -- Samir धर्म 06:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now take the final view of this section. I'll try my best to improve not only this section but this artcle too. Sushant gupta 06:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I just noticed that a lot of things have been added to Kolkata article without any sources. Example, "Black Town" thing in History section and the ever increasing list of "notables" in Culture. Can you look into it whenever you get time? --Blacksun 13:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have not changed the biography for Portal:West Bengal for a long time. Any problems? Regards and best wishes. -- P.K.Niyogi 13:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think, I will be able to handle the biographies, but please keep watching. I now find that the photo in Swami Vivekananda summary is not working and that in the Somnath Chatterjee summary is off (probably copyright vio). Your mango article is certainly interesting but that is beyond me. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 15:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is also some production information on Filmography of Satyajit Ray. I guess the version you have put up is a good starting point, but it could use some tweaking from that page. Also, I think the SatyajitRay.org page has a good deal of information. It says something about how he first got the idea while working for an advertising agency (I probably mentioned this before). --Kuaichik 22:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Sorry for not replying earlier. I was busy with RL. I don't have much knowledge about Delhi. I know of only one hard core Delhiite, but I think he is busy with RL too. Still, I'll try to improve the article if I can find some sources. - Aksi_great (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've become a bit busy, but will contribute to the Delhi article asap. deeptrivia (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I have commented on FAC about Delhi, but Im afraid I can't do much for it. Someone from Delhi could really help us get things in order. =Nichalp«Talk»= 16:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added the former Country Infobox. I have a small problem. The preceeding and succeeding kingdoms have slid to the bottom, rather than staying on top. Do you know how to rectify it.Thanks.Dineshkannambadi 02:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have drastically improved the history of Salt Lake.Kindly build a new section on History.the Salt Lake affairs needs more improvements.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitsanyal (talk • contribs)
Dear Daipayan,
I am a bureaucrat in the Government in charge of all the Governmment lands including Bidhannagar.My advice is not to be to much possesive about Wikipedia's edit.Please meet me at amitsanyal34@hotmail.com or amitsanyal34@gmail.com.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitsanyal (talk • contribs)
