User talk:E0steven/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I deleted the History section cause is poorly writen and needs a revision. --201.79.233.138 (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/January 2009#E0steven. SoxBot X (talk) 02:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Day after Day
It is their only Gold single. You can see for yourself on the RIAA database. Here is a link that proves this. I am going to change it again, and it is NOT vandalism as I have proof from the official RIAA site. Thank you --24.1.205.187 (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I've granted the right. Kanonkas was right to give pause, but the quality of your reverts counts for more than your tenure here. Remember to review WP:RBK please or ask me for any help. Pedro : Chat 20:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I have replaced the edit with just the facts
I worded my original edit too strongly so I have come back with the 'Dragnet' version (just the facts.) And I even left out some facts that simply would have -seemed- disparaging (because of how lame Everlast is). It would be very unfair to remove my factual additions and leave other information that is in no way more or less accurate, informative, or encyclopedic. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your use of an application to repeatedly undo my edits is causing me frustration. I urged you to not remove the factual information without entering into a discussion as to what about the facts you found objectionable. You failed to do this. Please explain why before removing the comments again or I will complain about you. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've reviewed your edit and undid my own reversion. I agree your first edits were not of the quality / NPOV required. You should see your new version as-is. However, I would still like some-sort of verification to your statements. When/where did he state that he should be attacked on sight? Could be gossip/rumor without any backing. Thanks e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 18:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Here is a source. I do not know how to source it. It is straight from the lyrics. http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Quitter-lyrics-Eminem/BA4A2B0CA28A9B0448256A7900023080 --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- "So this is what we ask of our fans
If you ever see Everlast, WHOOP HIS ASS Hit him with sticks, bricks, rocks, throw shit at him Kick him, spit on him, treat him like a hoe, bitch-slap him Do it for me, do it for Fred, do it for Limp Do it for Rock, do it for rap, do it for Kid Do it for Ice-T, do it just to do it, fuck it He's a bitch, he ain't gon' hit you back, he's nothin! Shit in five years we'll all be "Eating at Whitey's" And he'll be bussin tables in that bitch, cleanin the toilets" --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I saw your previous edit and reverted before checking to make sure it was a 'cleaned' up version. Please continue to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I suggest you head over to The Sandbox where testing and tutorials can help you become a better editor! Also it is easy and quick to make your own account on Wikipedia, have a name instead of a number :) e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 18:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Skyskyskyskyskysky
hey. that was quick. I am conducting a four day experiment for a sociology class where I add irrelevant information and see what happens (it would have been taken out at the end anyway) but can I ask how you caught that so fast and how you knew it was wrong? Replied to here e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Banmetoo regarding vandalism of Daniel's page
It said vandal-proof, so I took it as a challenge. Immature I know. It seemed a win-win situation - either I'd have managed to beat the vandal-proof-ness or the edit would have been removed, as it was. So the question is, how did you do that so quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Banmetoo (talk • contribs) 14:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- You shouldn't really take any vandal-proof listing as a challenge, however there are several tools for reverting vandalism quickly and efficiently. Hopefully you'll apply yourself to reverting vandalism instead of creating it! Tools like Huggle and Twinkle help with this process. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 14:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit war
Take the same action or actions that should be taken in any other edit war. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Third opinion is a good place to start if it's a simple disagreement over the interpretation of a policy. After that it's an RFC (on the article, not the users). Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Love your username. Is it a subtle reference to this? Daniel Case (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh. I did mean the "Even-Steven" thing; I hadn't thought about your first initial. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thnkas for the revert on my talk page
Just to get a second editors opionion would it be okay to give him a final warning. He clearly is here to be a vandal and his username is offensive? mczack26 speaktome 16:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would say go for it, however I would head here Wikipedia:Usernames_for_administrator_attention and request that username be removed. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 16:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers for the advice, Have one of these
mczack26 speaktome 21:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC) has Given you a free beer of your choice to wiki drink. This user advises you don't get to wiki drunk or you could get a wiki hangover.
See WP:FREEBEER for more info
Barnstar :)
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For your efforts in the war on vandalism. ~Ttony21(talk, contribs) 16:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC) |
Scuba diving
Thanks for your efforts to combat vandalism in the external links of Scuba diving. Unfortunately, it turns out that the link you reverted to was a 404 deal link. Anyway, it's been removed altogether now. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User talk:Mczack26isgay
User talk:Mczack26isgay, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mczack26isgay and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Mczack26isgay during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. mczack26 speaktome 21:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Chicago Geography
Harolds is in Chicago, which is in Illinois. Indiana's legal and social barriers have nothing to do with the early history of Harolds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.245.153 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Not A Fan
You are a wannabe editor. There was nothing wrong with my post on Ajax Secondary School. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DCsuccessmatters (talk • contribs) 19:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Replied to here (DCSuccessmatters - talk) e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 19:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page! BarretBonden (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem, just rolling back vandals all across the Wikipedia. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 19:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Unsectioned Comment
dear editor, yesterday i posted things to the Tottenham, Ontario site which were quickly taken away. it was fun, informative and FACTUAL. whoever took it away had absolutely no right and if there is someway to get it all back i would appreciate it greatly. the message i posted today was simply me venting my frustration over my hours of work being deleted within a day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.229.193 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
My user page
Thanks for reverting vandalism. LeaveSleaves 14:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem at all. I often see vandalism hitting the pages of other editors cleaning up. I suppose occasionally 'getting a little on yourself' is part and parcel with cleaning up the dregs! e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 15:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thank you so much for your anti-vandalism efforts while poor Ælfheah of Canterbury was on the main page! May an obscure little Anglo-Saxon bishop and saint bless you. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I'm positive he didn't deserve vandalism to an online encyclopedia way after his death. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 15:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
reverted edits on McVeigh page
Please don't revert the changes where paragraphs opening with 'he' have been changed to 'McVeigh'. Opening a non-fiction paragraph with 'he' is far too informal for something that purports to be an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.132.221 (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Gen Y
I did not vandalize it ... i changed it. Nobody calls Gen Y "Generation Why?" and it had reverted a more accurate longer paragraph.
Mimzy1990 (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
No category Entered
Dude, I just uploaded a factual piece of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.181.49 (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Read my talk page please. Syoungnz (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Quick question
I applaud your aggressive and quick antivandalism efforts but I have to say I was perplexed by this edit. Please tell me what I'm missing! JohnInDC (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
My edit to Run's House
Please explain you reversion of this edit. a little insignificant 21:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Replied to here e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 19:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, and good point. I was undoing a series of unnecessary edits by different IPs, one by one, without rollback. :( Ah well... Thanks for being so understanding! a little insignificant 19:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
And I reverted Your edit!
Because the very construction of the mainpage was a mistake by somebody[1]
Have a nice day Steven! -- Lavallen (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
A.E. Wilder-Smith
what i am uploading is not vandalism i do not apprietate having to keep on editing but i will if you and those other people dont —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godlover32795 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Breakfast edits
I think you were too hard at User talk:158.123.32.89. The IP has posted to Wikipedia:Help desk#it wasn't unconstructive!. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry. Won't happen again. ;-)--WildMIKE123 (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Nice work
You keep beating me to the punch on vandals. Keep up the great work. ;) Aruton (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
User:Stretch call has removed information supported by press reports and other reliable sources from Intercultural Open University. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, User:Stretch call has vandalized List of universities in the Netherlands by repeatedly removing information supported by press reports and has vandalized again Intercultural Open University. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Please don't revert good faith edits as vandalism
You reverted my changes on Fusion Power as unconstructive. I could understand if you had problems with my formatting or phrasing, but the actual edit I made was to cite an academic paper, where an unattributed claim resided on the page. You did this under the guise of reverting unconstructive edits, which I don't feel my changes were anywhere near. Please either explain to me in more detail what you found unacceptable about the change or re-revert it. I know I'm editting from an anonymous IP address, but that's no reason to assume my changes are vandalism or poorly informed. 162.111.235.34 (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Reply
Undid rollback of edits. Thanks for contributing! Sorry about the mistake. Also replied to on User talk e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 15:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
What isn't ducky...
...about the edits for the Ducky Pond entry?68.173.89.63 (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)SLY111
Reply
The fact that you have had several edits in quick succession (you do not need to do this) with the top most edit being in an incomplete state. In general you should use the preview function and make a complete edit to a section or reference before saving. At the very least finish all of your edits before leaving for an extended period. Thanks for your Contributions to Wikipedia! Also replied to User's talk e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 16:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Stock cubes...
Can & are a wide range of dimensions - "Chocolate bars are 29mm wide" would also be incorrect, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.160.153 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Replied on User's Talk: Cubes
I agree to some extent. However to someone unfamiliar with a bouillon cube an approximate size might be helpful. I would also say most cubes fall within the approximate size listed (ie there is a variety of shapes/sized but most fall relatively close). e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 22:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
message?
hello i have never edite a wikipedia article i just saw a yellow box come up saying i have a message saying i edited the article but i never did??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.217.27 (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Auto Sectioned Comment
I think my edit was constuctive Az5271 (talk) 23:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC) This clearly was not constructive. Thanks e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 00:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
gotcha
haha i trick you. it was me! i am liar! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.217.27 (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
recent contributions
Hi,
It says you amended one of my recent contributions but now when I look at the page, none of my amendments are showing. I would also like to change the page name to "Daps". How can we resolve this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinkFalsies (talk • contribs) 00:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Reply (Posted on Users Talk)
I reverted your changes because it looks like you were testing. When editing a page please use the preview button and do not save partial sentences (sentence ending in 'and'). You're welcome to continue editing a page (using the Preview). The changes you made were rolled back, so feel free to make them again and Happy Editing. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 00:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
re: recent contributions
Thanks for the info, and my apologies for my lack of use of the preview function. Is there a way the changes I made can be reverted? It took me quite a while to make those key amendments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinkFalsies (talk • contribs) 00:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Reply (Posted on Users Talk)
You can view the history of the page by clicking the 'History' tab at the top of the page. You can then click on individual edits made to see the page at that point in time. Happy Editing e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 01:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
re: re: recent contributions
Thanks. Also, the primary title of the page should read "Daps" with secondary name being something else. How is this amended? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinkFalsies (talk • contribs) 01:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
My edit was not inconstructive
yoda is really a muppet --67.80.54.108 (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)