User talk:ERHaxhiu

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ERHaxhiu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 00:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello ERHaxhiu, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ciara Bravo has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of FIFA country codes, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo national football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Kosovo national football team.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please see the talk page for the discussion on this and stop reverting to your preferred view before any consensus is reached. Fenix down (talk) 08:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo national football team. Qed237 (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kosovo national football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qed237 (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo national football team. Qed237 (talk) 21:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo national football team[edit]

Hi. Please read this information and if you have any questions feel free to ask.

Your edit behaviour at Kosovo national football team is about to turn in to longer blocks if you keep up with the same edits over and over again, so please read this and respond.

The first issue with your edits (like this) is the flag for coaches. It has been discussed at Talk:Kosovo national football team#Edit war over flags for coaches and we should display the flag for their nation at the time they were coach (otherwise the flag is usually nation at time of birth for WP:BLP). This was corrected here by User:VEO15 after the discussion.

The second issue is with the country results in the infobox. When there is an official defeat that is bigger than an earlier unoffical defeat, then there is no need to display the unofficial result as it is smaller defeat. We display unofficial biggest defeat just to show that they have lost bigger than the official match, but in an unofficial match. If they get an official win that is bigger than the unofficial win, the unofficial win will be removed there as well.

Then you also change the dates for the Match record section when you say they were a part of serbia until 1998 and after that they were not UEFA or FIFA members. However, Kosovo's Parliament declared independence on 17 February 2008, and Kosovo national football team applied for FIFA membership on 6 May 2008. For that reason, we should list Kosovo as part of Yugoslavia and Serbia until 2008, and that they were not UEFA or FIFA members after that. Not sure where you get 1998 from?

Please keep this in mind and remember that making these edits over and over again without discussion may be considered as disruptive. Qed237 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How many times should we have to talk to you before you understand. Please stop doing your disruptive edits and start talking. Qed237 (talk) 10:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fenix down (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kosovo national football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qed237 (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: could you please highlight specifically what vandalism is occurring here? There are substantial changes, a small amount of which do seem valid, but I'm not sure about a lot, it would be helpful to assess the situation if you could highlight specific elements, hopefully then ERHaxhiu can respond directly on them. @ERHaxhiu: can you please start responding to other editor's discussions, the only reason I have not blocked you again for longer than a month is because I want to clarify exactly what vandalism is occurring. You seriously need to start engaging with other editors, your behaviour in this article is not conducive to collaborative efforts. Fenix down (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: He repeats the edits he was told about above in User talk:ERHaxhiu#Kosovo national football team. For example he insists of changing flags for managers (this edit and this edit today, and on 7 July (last block), 2 July, 29 June, 22 June, 21 June, 15 June, 14 June, 10 June, 10 June and those are only after discussion at Talk:Kosovo national football team#Edit war over flags for coaches started and it was many before that) and also he does the other things explained above changing dates without reason, adding content to infobox that should not be there, and so on. I can give you many examples and it is not good that the editor has not made a single attempt to talk at any talkpage. Qed237 (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ajet Shosholli's nationality is Kosovo-Albanian from Serbia and Montenegro

Muharrem Sahiti's nationality is Kosovo-Albanian from UNMIK (Kosovo)

Edmond Rugova's nationality is Kosovo-Albanian from UNMIK (Kosovo)

Kujtim Shala's nationality is Kosovo-Albanian from Croatia

Albert Bunjaki's nationality is Kosovo-Albanian from Sweden

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ERHaxhiu (talk • contribs)

@ERHaxhiu: could you please respond to this here? I didn't see that the flags were changed again. I'm struggling to think of a reason why you shouldn't be blocked again, you have been blocked several times for editing against consensus and each time you come back and continue in exactly the same manner without any attempt to engage with editors who are raising concerns with you on your talk page or on the article talk page. Fenix down (talk) 11:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: All my edits are based on facts, even editing in Albert Bunjaki's Wiki article is deleted by someone — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERHaxhiu (talk • contribs)

Also could you please stop adding unsourced information to WP:BLP. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 11:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: I got the Albert Bunjaki's biography from official website of Football Federation of Kosovo, you a few months ago in Kosovo national football team's Wiki article in the rubric by whom managed the Kosovo national football team, you have highlighted the Kosovo national football team managed from Football Federation of Srbija. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERHaxhiu (talk • contribs)

I was asked to comment here...I have absolutely zero knowledge of football in Kosovo, but it seems clear to me that ERHaxhiu is not vandalizing anything; perhaps he is just mistaken about a few things. Qed237 also seems to be taking the easiest solution and reverting everything. For Albert Bunjaki, as far as I can see, he is not Swedish, but he did live in Sweden as a refugee. At least in English, we would not consider him to be "Swedish" just because he lived there. This is all just a misunderstanding, I'm sure. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So looking at the individual edits in question, I have queries for both of you:

Manager flags - It seems that the talk page established some consensus that using the UN flag was not appropriate. Given that this was one of the main reasons why you have been blocked in the past, I am not sure why you (ERHaxhiu) continue to revert this section when the correct course of action is to discuss on the talk page or take to WP:FOOTY if you need a wider audience.
small copyed - this is incorrect english so should have been reverted.
Head-to Head Section QED, why did you revert this, ERHaxhiu's edit seems to add sources and a valid image. There are some small formatting issues, but these could be sorted out without the need to revert.
List of Matches Again QED, I'm not sure where the vandalism is here, if anything additional sources seem to have been added which are valid. I think any issues here should have been resolved through editing not reverting.

Overall, ERHaxhiu, I think you need to explain your continued behaviour around nationality flags, as that is really continuing to edit war. QED, I'm not really convinced that there was any need for all the reverting, I would like you to specifically indicate why the whole lot needed to go, I'm a bit lost as to why. Fenix down (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)@Adam Bishop: Not sure why, or who asked you to comment, but at Albert Bunjaki I restored the good content. However, I dont think there is any mistake, it is obvious that ERHaxhiu is trying to impose his bisaed view and to keep on changing the flags despite several attempts to discuss with him is disruptive behaviour azt the very least (a lot of editors consider it vandalism). He repeatedly makes bad edits without any explanation so WP:NOTHERE? Qed237 (talk) 12:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I presume this post was made before you read my detailed comments. There is a minor edit war on flags going on here, but there is also questionable removal of substantial content, including valid sources for which explanation ought to be given. Fenix down (talk) 12:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: A lot of the reasons is explained in the section above, there is a lot of concerns with the edits. I will respond more detailed shortly. Qed237 (talk) 12:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you could, I'm not seeing the necessity for the blanket reverting but there is so much being removed in so many places it is difficult to tell. Fenix down (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to the questions from Fenix down.

Not only is the UN flag inappropriate but we never display current flags/nations. For example Muharrem Sahiti was born in Vitina, Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and not Vitina, Kosovo as it is today). In "place of birth" we reflect the nation it was at the time of birth, not current nation. We say Julius Caesar was Roman, not Italian (born in Rome, Roman Republic and not Rome, Italy) and so on. The same applies for these national flags were we display the nation the managers belonged to at the time they were managers. We should not go back in history and change flags depending on what nation cities and WP:BLPs belongs to today. This was also discussed at talkpage and should not be changed without consensus.
Agreed.
The issues I have with this is that the image text may soon get outdated saying he is the current leading scorer. Also the incorrect minus-sign is used. However you are right, I probably could have corrected it without reverting, I have just gotten tired of the persistent disruption from the editor.
In Template:Goal there is no such thing as "og.". Linking to Albania and other nations is WP:OVERLINKING. There is nothing wrong with linking to "Bujar Pregja" and footballers even if it is a redlink. But okay, this is the same as the previous question. A lack of patience with this editor and seeing the change of flags again together with the other changes I explained in the previous section made me take the easy way and revert it all. Qed237 (talk) 12:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. My comments below:

Agreed, the continuing replacement of these flags is an edit war against consensus
Agreed.
Then the image can be removed or the caption corrected. You are right, you should have corrected the errors not reverted.
Again, as you accept the right thing was to correct the errors, they were not so significant that they broke the page.

The following conclusion seems fair to all:

ERHaxhiu - this is the only warning you will receive. Do not under any circumstances revert the flags in this article without gaining consensus on the talk page to do so first. If you do this again, you will be blocked again, for at least three months.
ERHaxhiu - no one can force you to engage with other editors, but user talk and article talk pages are there for a reason, you'll find things move much more smoothly if you engage with other editors there.
QED - You are formally warned for your reverts. I note that you accept and understand what the correct course of action should have been, so there is no need for any other sanction, but please don't let your frustrations lead to mass reverts in future.
QED - It would be of benefit to everyone if you could revert your reverts and make corrections where necessary as a significant amount of the content added was valid.

Fenix down (talk) 13:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: Sounds good, I self-reverted and then modified the article so I am currently satisfied. Let me know if I missed something. Qed237 (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, thanks QED. I think the article is in a much better place than it was earlier today which is a good thing. Fenix down (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Bishop:

@Fenix down:

@Qed237:

I am from Kosovo.
I know that Albert Bunjaki is Kosovar Albanian refugee in Sweden, the issue of the UN flag is that Kosovo has been administered by the UN until 2008. The issue of citizenship is that time management verse of the national football team for the men of Kosovo, Kosovo has been withdrawn autonomy (ie. It was part of Serbian-Montenegrin federation, but after the war the inhabitants of Kosovo has changed the nationality from the inhabitants of the Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo in inhabitants of Kosovo, which was managed by UNMIK, therefore Muharrem Sahiti who has managed the national team from 2005 to 2006 while Edmond Rugova has managed the national team only a year (ie. only in 2006), then the Kujtim Shala of which was a Kosovar with Croatian citizen on the invitation of Kosovo cometh and It has managed since 2006 to independence for Kosovo and then in 2009 became Albert Bunjaki becomes coach of national team. Kosovo from 1946 to 1974 has been the Yugoslav provice, then after the adoption of the Constitution of 1974, Kosovo became a province by province, lasted from 1989 to 1992 when it was abolished Kosovo's autonomy and became part of Serbian-Montenegrin federation and in 1998 started the war in Kosovo ended in June 1999 and from June 1999 until the declaration of independence was under the management of UNMIK and Kosovo after the declaration itself managed — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERHaxhiu (talk • contribs)

Non-free image use[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Croatia national football team, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group I.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 17:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use of File:Kosovo FA.png[edit]

Hi ERHaxhiu. File:Kosovo FA.png is licensed as a non-free image for use on Wikipedia. This means that each use of it in an article needs to staisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria found at WP:NFCCP. One of these criteria is WP:NFCC#10c which say that a separate, specific non-free use rationale is required for each use of the image. So, if you feel that the file's non-free usage in Kosovo national football team is justified, then please add the approrpiate non-free use rationale to the file's page. Please note that a "separate, specific non-free use rationale" excludes open-ended rationales (i.e., for company ABC and all its representative sub-divisions, etc.) written for mutliple uses by design simply because the reasons for non-free use may not be applicable every article where the file is used.

For future reference, it's probably a good idea to check an image file's licensing before adding it to an article. You can do this by simply clicking on the image itself. There are basically two types of images found in Wikipedia articles: freely licensed/public domain and non-free content. The former can be pretty used as desired as logo as the use meets WP:IUP; the latter, however, are subject to WP:NFCC in addition to IUP, which means there are more restrictions placed on how they may be used.

If you have any questions about image licensing, feel free to ask them at WP:MCQ. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo national football team again[edit]

Hi again. Could you please stop doing the same edits over and over again when you have been reverted. It is considered disruptive and you should always try and discuss first.

This time you added unofficial result to biggest loss, which was explained to you above should not be included. We already have official match with a bigger loss so it is unneccesary.

Then you introduced "fake" headers, using semicolon (in multiple steps, diff, diff, diff). This way of using headers should be avoided if possible, which it is in this case. However, after they were removed, you re-added them again and this time also removing redlinks, which I also explained to you above were okay (redlinks are okay if subject is notable). I also explained this when reverting your edit. However, you did the exact same thing again (third time) and this is not acceptable. You know your edits has been reverted (with explanation) then you should discuss.

The logo was removed with an explanation that is was removed per WP:NFCCE as the image was not free. Yet you readded the logo before you were reverted and it was removed again.

@Fenix down: What do you think of this? Consider this as a final warning? Qed237 (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you must stop adding unsourced material and you have been warned about it in the past. Yet you keep trying to add same unsourced content over and over again (diff and diff). Qed237 (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now this is at ANI, I think it would be best if I keep my comments to that forum until this is resolved. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo national football team. Qed237 (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Samir Ujkani, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned before Qed237 (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: It is time to accept this bitter reality about Kosovo — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERHaxhiu (talk • contribs)

Comments like that are really not helpful. The discussion about your contributions and whether you should be allowed to continue editing enWiki has now moved on from this talk page. I would strongly advise you to engage with the comments editors have made at the ANI link above otherwise you may well find yourself permanently blocked. Fenix down (talk) 08:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. If you do not engage at the aforementioned thread before editing articles again then I will enact a community ban. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You must comment on your behaviour and not on the fact that you know about football in Kosovo. This is your only warning, comment on your edit behaviour or get a community ban (block from wikipedia without any chance of ever being unblocked). Qed237 (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. I would like you to respond to the concerns about your edit behvaiour (and not how much you know about Kosovo football). Qed237 (talk) 19:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note for any admin reviewing any future unblock request - please see this discussion. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have received your email (all three of them). An unblock won't be done through email (at least by me). Please follow the appealing a block instructions above. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have also received your two emails to me. First, I am not an administrator, so there is literally nothing I can do to unblock you. Second, you must follow the unblock request instructions above. Third, continuing to email editors demanding that they unblock you is not going to help your case at all. Please review the ANI case and learn from it. WP:FOOTY really needs your expertise in Kosovo football, but if you can't follow the most basic policies and guidelines, then you will unfortunately not be welcome. Please take this as the constructive advice that I intend it to be. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 22:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop emailing me and stop socking. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ERHaxhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16458 was submitted on Sep 02, 2016 19:17:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello. I decided to talk to two admins, you and another person on the same subject. I asked about the KTFF 50th Anniversary Cup your version is very good, even the version in Persian.

But I note that the French version Coupe du 50e anniversaire de la KTFF of that problem, I would like to understand why? There are 14 reliable sources in 2 sources (Article 1 and 8) are two books that talks about a tournament on the 50 years of the federation and the other book on the team, 2 works speak of the competition.

The seventh source shows Yucel Hatay, known for writing several books on "Cyprus Turkish Football Association", "football in North Cyprus" and the "Northern Cyprus national football team".

The arguments given by those who are against this article, leaves desired. They say Sourcing very poor, anecdotal ....

Yet there were competitions around the world or there was a single edition that is on Wikipedia, sometimes with no sources. I admit to having trouble understanding for the latter. The two books are definitely the best sources.

Cordially. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:F48F:1CC6:E35A:1ABD (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, ERHaxhiu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]