User talk:E Con211

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, E Con211, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of Carlton Football Club players. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jenks24 (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

New player articles

G'day Mr Con211, just wanted to say well done on the two new articles you wrote today. I've added some templates and categories and will clean up some of the refs. However, please note that some people take the WP:NSPORTS notability guidelines as meaning that players who have not yet played at AFL level aren't notable enough to have articles about them. I generally believe that if there is some significant coverage (ie not just a brief mention) in independent (ie not the club website) reliable sources (not a forum etc) then it meets the WP:GNG and can remain. In general I avoid writing articles on new recruits until they are named to play a premiership season game. If you want to help out, then there are plenty of older players that are redlinks on List of Carlton Football Club players that you could create. References like AFL tables and Trove for pre-1955 newspaper articles or google news archives for some scanned version of The Age in the 1970s/80s can be useful to learn more about players from previous eras. The-Pope (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

- OK thanks for the advice, I might check out some older players from the 70s or 60s and just give some of them who played a decent amount of games a bio. Sorry I didnt know that I should wait until they've been named in a game. Sam Rowe is likely to play a fair bit and I guess I'm just excited about Bootsma, I make sure I only give guys who have started playing articles from now on. E Con

FYI, I've encountered the same problem in the past - and although I don't particularly agree with the notability guidelines that The-Pope alluded to, I put up with them. But, as a result, I have pre-written articles ready to be copied-and-pasted for all of the Carlton players who are currently on the list but haven't played a game. Aspirex (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Luke Mitchell (footballer) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah sorry I was fiddling around and I clicked save instead of preview. Sorry about that. I might just practice some more stuff in the sandbox from now on. E_Con211

Proposed deletion of Mark Amos

The article Mark Amos has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bmusician 01:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I just inserted some reliable refernces, please don't delete it! User:E_Con211

Nomination of Mark Amos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Amos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Amos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand why it might be deleted, I immediately added refernces to the page immediately after I first created it. User:E_Con211

Don't worry about it

Hey. Just dropping by to say don't worry about your article being nominated for deletion – it's the other editors who are in the wrong, not you. You're free to take part in the deletion discussion if you want (it's at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Amos). These sort of discussions normally last seven days, but because this is such an open-and-shut case (played in the VFL/AFL = notable) it might be closed earlier. I hope this doesn't discourage you from creating new articles, but to avoid this happening in future, it's always best to have a few references in the article when you create it because there are some editors who will jump all over an unreferenced article even if it's only a few minutes old (though why it was again nominated for deletion after you added references I'll never know). Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

You definitely did nothing wrong, but there are somethings you could do better. try to avoid publishing partially complete articles - use the preview button or save it to your sandbox and then move it when the article has sufficient context and refs. Have a look at the categories and reference formating that Jenks24 and I have added to your articles and try to copy it. We were all new here once and I look back at some of my first edits with some embarrassment! Keep it up -think of this as the NAB cup period! The-Pope (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

OK thanks for the encouragement guys, i've only made 5 articles but its my goal for every Carlton player in history to have an article on him, hopefully some more wikipedians will help me out with this rather huge task. User:E_Con211

Good luck with that... a quick redlink count using WP:AWB comes up with 529 more to go! <schoolteacher mode>Now I'm not going to touch Daryl Gutterson, so please add the categories, talk page WikiProject templates and format the refs better (to avoid duplication of refs, use the named refs function). Try to avoid only using blueseum as a ref - as it is contribution based, ie like a wiki, some people may not consider it a reliable source, even though we know that they are very diligent about getting it right. Don't forget to add the stats link. This is an open book exam, you are ENCOURAGED to copy other people's work (it's the easiest way to learn how things work) and there is no deadline (but as you've seen today, other editors might not be as generous!) For your 2nd task, work out how you get yourself into Category:Wikipedian Carlton Blues fans. Have fun! The-Pope (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I think it might be difficult for me to not use Blueseum because for many players it is literally the only place where there is any background info on them. Oh and User:The-Pope would you mind just showing me on this chat page how to correctly format references so they don't duplicate and displayed correctly. Cheers. User:E_Con211

It is OK to use, but try to find another source as well. Searching the archives of google news finds quite a few scanned copies of The Age from the 1970s and 80s and for pre-1955 stuff, the trove service at www.nla.gov.au (ie http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/result?q=carlton+football) is virtually complete in it's coverage. Otherwise books or even the Carlton website or modern newspapers might have some mentions of older players. Use dates and info from Blueseum to narrow down your search for when the automatic text recognition isn't that good. For the refs, read Wikipedia:Inline_citation#Ref_tags, or like I suggested, copy what I did at Graham Gilchrist. The-Pope (talk) 10:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Carlton Football Club players, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andrew Collins and Matthew Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Daryl Gutterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princes Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:2013–14 Football League Cup

Please see Talk:2013–14 Football League Cup. GiantSnowman 13:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, E Con211. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, E Con211. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed content from Starship Troopers (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DonIago (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Corey Durdin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Corey Durdin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi thanks for the message, I've added some sources and submitted it for review E Con211 (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corey Durdin has been accepted

Corey Durdin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Brodie Kemp (footballer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Brodie Kemp (footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 04:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodie Kemp (footballer) has been accepted

Brodie Kemp (footballer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 02:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)