User talk:Eastern Nat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Eastern Nat! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Redrose64 (talk) 17:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Harwich International railway station. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RedRose64,
I suspect I'm using the wrong methodology to send this message, but cannot see how I would do it on my own page.
I appreciate your prompting me to note the source of my edits, but in nearly all the edits to date, it is largely my own knowledge that I am reproducing, and would not include any remark or information on which I wasn't sure of my facts.
I will add some source data on my edits to date as I have a large collection of railway and shipping books which I can use, but please bear in mind that I was born and raised in Parkeston + Harwich, residing in the town for 28 years and having left the town in 1972 would have returned to see my family on countless occasions since.
I am a transport professional, being both a tutor and lecturer in my profession [ shipbroker ] and have a very deep interest in all forms of transport. I worked in the shipping industry at both Navyard Wharf and in independent shipping offices at Parkeston Quay.
My grandfather was a top link engine driver based at Parkeston, and my father served on the locally based vessels of the railway and Trinity House, all of which probably explains why I'm a geek !
LOL
Sorry your a GWR man, its a bit like being bottom of the premiership !
I jest, I have very fond memories of holidays spent in Cheltenham [ Leckhampton actually ] having arrived at St. James from good old Paddington. Train spotted at Lansdown Road where the GWR and LMS tracks ran side-by-side and also spent time in the Cheltenham + Distr. Bus Depot with my uncle right beside the LMS tracks fairly adjacent to Lansdown.
I hope you will bear with me while I find my feet.
Best Wishes / --Eastern Nat (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talk pages are like any other pages, you use the section [edit] links to edit a section. Further information at WP:TPG.
The problem with using personal knowledge is that this is unverifiable, and may also constitute original research, so falls foul of some of Wikipedia's core policies. You can find out how to add references to articles at WP:REFBEGIN and also WP:CITE, but it is essential that you use reliable sources. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing[edit]

Hi, I have fixed up your attempts to add references to Mayflower Line (see here), and to Harwich Town railway station (see here).

As I mentioned above, information on how to add references is given at WP:REFBEGIN and at WP:CITE.

The tags <ref>...</ref> are used in the article text, with the reference information between them, and the article should have a {{reflist}} lower down (some use a <references /> instead). When the page is displayed, the content of the <ref>...</ref> tags is automatically formatted and shown at the point where the {{reflist}} was placed. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Thank you; you've now got the hang of it...way to go and keep up the good work. Cheers.

Lectonar (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

GER ships[edit]

You're doing a good job there. How do you feel about writing an article or two on the individual ships. Take a look at the SS Brussels article for an idea of what such an artice should look like. Any questions, feel free to ask. Mjroots (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.I have other slightly less ambitious bits and pieces which I'm working on, but longer term I might be back for some advice. Eastern Nat (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RAF RAYDON

To : Redrose64 - Hello Redrose64,I am not sure that your 'fix' for RAF Raydon is technically correct. It is not something I know a lot about,but was curious to know which airfield was involved following my edits on the Hadleigh Line. RAF Raydon no longer exists so the word 'now' is not correct, but also it seemed to me in searching for the information that all the UK bases used by the USAF during the war still seemd to be called 'RAF xxxx'. I suspect that post-war any U.S. military establishment in the UK was subject to a contract and fee, whereas during the war the USAF were based at RAF stations on what might have been called an 'all hands on the pump' scenario. That might explain why the name would have been 'RAF Raydon' at the time. I'm not sure, but it worth mentioning. I hope otherwise, that I have progressed from my early editing attempts. Best Wishes / Eastern Nat +

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Associated Humber Lines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Wilson's & North Eastern Railway Shipping Co. Ltd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Hull & Netherlands Steamship Co. Ltd., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Holland Steamship Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 20:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]