User talk:EditWiki45

EditWiki45, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi EditWiki45! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the basis of this block is your continued false claims that the images were your work, both on en.wiki and at Commons.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23, I know I made a mistake and if you see my talk page edit history you will get to know that I apologized for my mistake and I myself reverted one kf those pics and I just once claimed that they are my work because I didn't knew about this. I even asked you for help on your commons talk page and I repeatedly apologized for my mistake. Please don't block me as I accepted my mistake and was trying to correct it. Please see if I can be unblocked. Because I have also made many good edits on this way. Hope you reply me positively. Regards, EditWiki45 (talk) 00:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of what you say above is untrue. You claimed that at least three images were your own work on Commons. I don't even know what "I didn't knew about this" means in this context. You obviously knew they were not your own work. Your uploads and your use of them on Wikipedia were a complete deception. You even edit-warred to keep them in and didn't self-revert until you were caught. As for your post on my Talk page at Commons, that was a transparent attempt to save yourself from adverse administrative action.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditWiki45 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for posting three pics that I took from Instagram.I posted them on Kylie Jenner Kendall Jenner and Kim Kardashian. But the same pics were available on different websites. A user reverted my edits. I undid his revisions and it of context I said that I have marked those pics as my work so how come there be a copyright violation. Then I recived a copyright notice from a user (admin). As soon as I read this notices I went to Kim Kardashian page and myself reverted the edit. I was about to revert other pics but couldn't do it because I thought of replying to the messages on the talk page first. Meanwhile other user reverted those edits and he too asked me how is it my work and I told him that this was just a show of my foolishness and that I apologise. The summary is I made a mistake, apologized, tried corrected then and even did to an extent still I have recieved the block and that too ab indefinite block. Please help me because if we go through my contributions and my stats I have made many good edits with some bad too. Please see if I can be unblocked or if my block time can be reduced or may be removed. For any further please message me on my talk page. Hoping for a positive reply.EditWiki45 (talk) 01:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While the immediate reason for your block may have been copyright violations, it is clear that you have been very disruptive on here and have consistently displayed an unwillingness to acknowledge or accept feedback. The only reason a casual observer can't see this is because you delete every single such discussion from your talk page. —SpacemanSpiff 01:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bbb23 you say that I reverted after I got caught if you see the things happened in a very short interval of time. Please go and see my discussion section in User talk:FMSky named something like Why you reverted my edit. It is present at the very last untill now. You will get to know my point after reading the while convo. I was a little overconfident in starting but I later got your notices and I myself apologized. And as far as my msg on your commons talk page is concerned you can see that I wrote what I felt and if you feel (which you do) that I did that to avoid any action. Then sir you can check my edit history of my talk page. I have asked for help from admins even before. Please see all the sides and then reply me.EditWiki45^talk EditWiki45 (talk) 01:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpacemanSpiff Sir you can check the edit history of my talk page. I have asked for help from admins even before. And as I said I argued only on the matters that I was unknown to. But after realising mistakes I have also apologized. Please see all the sides and then reply me. Please go and see my discussion section in User talk:FMSky named something like Why you reverted my edit. It is present at the very last untill now. You will get to know my point after reading the while convo. I was a little overconfident in starting but I did the right thing before it could get worse.EditWiki45^talk EditWiki45 (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing us toward the legal threat, I missed that while reviewing your unblock. —SpacemanSpiff 02:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpacemanSpiff I mentioned it because the guy used a foul language and I said according to the times (rules mentioned times by mistake) of Wikipedia EditWiki45 (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of us have said what we need to, that you can't understand the problem is exactly why we're here. I'm revoking talk page access now. —SpacemanSpiff 13:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 47307[edit]

UTRS appeal #47307 has been closed. Noting legal threat was noted above. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was given because of foul language and I mentioned that it will be according to the rules of Wikipedia which meant a notice by one of you admins. What about my explanation?Deepfriedokra EditWiki45 (talk) 02:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have explained much. But still I am telling this again as I have been told in my UTRS appeal. I made three edits which were wrong. After knowing that they violate policies here I reverted one edit and was about to revert others too. But as of now, all those are reverted. And to add to corrections, before getting blocked I nominated all the three pics I uploaded for speedy deletion and they are already deleted. I did my best to correct my mistake till tge time I was allowed to do. But now I am not able to do anything because of the block. If you admins think that this explanation is somewhat good to unblock me or reduce time of my block then please do it. And before signing off I would like to bring to your notice that I have made 500 edits. And 25-odd edits were reverted. Do its a 500:20 ratio. I think I deserve atleast 1 more chance to orove my worth. Rest depends on you guys.Bbb23, Deepfriedokra, SpacemanSpiff and all other admins of Wikipedia. Regards, EditWiki45^talk EditWiki45 (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the personal attack and revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]