User talk:Educationalist080

Welcome!

Hello, Educationalist080, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic London 21:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Educationalist080 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tokyogirl79, It is true, I was/am the same user as pointed out in the sockpuppetry investigation but I created this specific account to "restart my Wikipedia life" and with this account I only did legitimate edits; when I removed something, I would first discuss it on talk pages. I admit and confess that in the past I vandalized articles, engaged in sockpuppetry and broke the rules and I apologize; I APOLOGIZE. I got punished and I regret my bad actions in the past and openly confess them. I mean, do I not have the right to restart my "Wikipedia life"? I don't know what to say more; yes, yes, yes, I intentionally engaged in vandalizm, I intentionally committed sockpuppetry and I violated the rules; I confessed this and confess it now, I apoligize, I regret all of it and I got punished with blocks. Do you need to reproach this to me forever? Do I not have a right to restart and leave my bad actions behind me? Again, I don't know what I can do or say more. If I cannot be forgiven, I implore you that at least you please restore my article Cambridge International General Certificate of Education - Advanced Level as this article was legitimate in terms of content and sources and I had worked for a long time on it. Educationalist080 (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Resuming that same kind of editing that got your first account blocked isn't the most clever way to make a clean start. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ohnoitsjamie: Then please, please tell me how I can restart... if I register a new account it is instantly against the rules... so I it is virtually impossible for me to make a clean start. Man, I confessed my mistakes, I apologized... what else can I do? So, please advise me on how I can make a new, clean start as I really want to. Educationalist080 (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe stop making edits regarding school certifications? If you're unable to do that, you're just going to keep getting blocked.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Wow, so I am never ever allowed to comment on a school certificate again? That's what I call freedom of speech. Seriously, I violated the rules, I confessed my mistakes, I got punished and I apologized. You know, although I made several mistakes, I did not murder anyone. This one article was a brand new article I had created, it had been patrolled on and approved.

I cannot register a new account and comment on anything (no matter whether or not it is school certificates or not) as this would again be against the rules. I also bet you are not even thinking about giving me another chance even though I see and regret what I did wrong.

Again, if I am simply not worth to be forgiven in your eyes because of my mistakes although I regret them; can you perhaps please (I implore you) restore this article? My actions in the past were wrong but this article should have been my first step into a clean start and it didn't get deleted because it had flaws or inappropriate content but because it was written by me and I see that I now seem to be regarded like a serious criminal with no rights anymore.

Thank you for your time. Educationalist080 (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Free_speech. We usually recommend that users blocked for sockpuppetry make unblock appeals from their original account. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie:

You see, at this stage, I don't care if I am unblocked or not, we both know that I would not be unblocked anyway. I am ready to accept my punishment for my mistakes and to get banned on Wikipedia. For me it is now about the article only as it was deleted because I was the author and not because the article itself was wrong. So, I ask you again; I implore you; can you at least restore the article? Remember, even a murderer who gets sentenced to death is allowed a last meal.Educationalist080 (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]