User talk:EdwardZhao

Home	Talk	Contributions	Awards

Userpage Vandalism

{{helpme}} Some one keeps editing my user page. What should I do to stop that? Thanks.--EdwardZhao (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

It was a vandal who decided to target you for some reason, they've now been blocked and won't bother you again, I'm sorry that was your first experience here--Jac16888 ^Talk 02:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)--Jac16888 ^Talk 02:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!--EdwardZhao (talk) 02:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Quotations

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quotations, there is nowhere states that the official websites are not the reliable sources of reference for his honors and accomplishments. What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.197.80 (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Remember to discuss your changes with other users that disagree with you. Reverting without an explanation is probably not the best way to settle a problem. In addition, please remember to sign your name after leaving a comment. Thanks!--EdwardZhao (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Murder City Devils article edit was correct

Edward, please undo your revision of my edits. The changes I made were technically correct as they were written in the future tense, not substantially related to the History section, and should have been in a trivia section or removed entirely.

Ok, I will do that. Please remember to add an edit summary next time you remove information. Also, remember to sign your name.--EdwardZhao (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar! Made my day :) -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome!--EdwardZhao (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I saw that

But my computer slowed down before I could fix it. Serendi^podous 13:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Ok, no problem.--EdwardZhao (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for DarkOrbit

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Warring States

Hello! Your submission of The Warring States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NickDupree (talk) 01:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT2 works well. Congratulations -- passed you! NickDupree (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!--EdwardZhao (talk) 21:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Warring States

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Reverts

I was reverting his edit at the same time you were. Sorry about that. Lukep913 19:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.--EdwardZhao (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Violinconcerto

Hi Edward, thanks for the note! I know that there is some trouble, but I am *not* an organization and I am not promoting my site. I am just adding a link to my website because there is data which is not provided on the Wikipedia sites. My site is the result of more than 15 years of serious research. Therefore (and for different other reasons) I cannot understand why the user MikeWazowski is deleting my external links all the time. I wrote him and clarify the problem, but he does not answer and just deletes my entries. I don't know why he is in the position to decide what has to be deleted and whats not, therefore I am undoing his undos. Therefore the trouble and in fact I don't know how to solve this.

Best, Tobias (user: violinconcerto) (----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.26.244 (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! Best, Tobias (user:violinconcerto) (----)

Hello Edward, just want to let you know that I followed your advice and added information to an article and made a citation - with the result of being blocked! So this can just happen? Some people decide whats wrong and thats it? What can I do to get unblocked? Best, Tobias (user: violinconcerto) (----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.35.186 (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Sigh, I don't think you deserved the block, but if you look on your talk page, there is a link where you can go to appeal the block. As long as your site is backed by reliable sources, I believe you should be able to use it.--EdwardZhao (talk) 19:09, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

COI / DeLi Linux

Hello Edward.

I'd like to explain what my changes of the DeLi Linux page were about.

The old domain "delilinux.de" points to a webpage, that cannot be maintained anymore, becase the contract was canceled several years ago, but the provider didn't cancel the domain and the webpage (why? we don't know). The content management is probably not accessible anymore.

A newer domain "delilinux.org" was created be Henry Jensen (author of the DeLi Linux) later and it's currently partially redirected to the new official DeLi Linux home (deli.tavvva.net). But the "delilinux.org" domain has been cancelled too and probably won't be renewed after the following expiration date/time : 2012-06-09 13:07:51.

Please, look at the ConnochaetOS forum (http://www.connochaetos.org/forum/topic.php?post=7291), where Henry Jensen put his statement and suggested DeLi users to visit the new forum at delicate.tavvva.net. He provided me with all DeLi sources and removed the DeLi development section from the ConnochaetOS forum, because the old DeLi Linux doesn't comply with the ConnochaetOS rules defined in the Free System Distribution Guidelines.

Note, that none of the projects has a commercial character.

Please, let me know if any acceptable way of the URL change exists, because we don't want people to think, that the old DeLi project is dead.

Thanks in advance.

Jaromir (Tavvva). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavvva (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your explanation. Your username (Tavvva) was included in the link you inserted so it appeared to be a spam link to some sort of a personal website. Now that you have explained, I'll go ahead and revert myself. Thank you for fixing the links. Also, I have a questioin. Is "Tavvva" the name of an organization? If so, you will need to change your username (at WP:CHU )to something that represents yourself only. Wikipedia has a policy against usernames representing groups/organizations/companies. Thanks for your contributions. --EdwardZhao (talk) 22:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Edward. Tavvva is just my nickname. I'm one of many opensource volunteers and making a distribution for obsolete computers is my hobby. It's a puzzle for adults :] I can expect only users from poor countries or nostalgic people who can't put their old (but still working hardware) in the trash. Thank You. Regards, Jaromir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavvva (talk • contribs) 07:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Edward.

I'm unsure if I was expected to revert the changes or wait for You to revert them. Please, let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavvva (talk • contribs) 19:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot..done!--EdwardZhao (talk) 19:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A roman scandal (film)

The article A roman scandal (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Title and description are a total misfit. Also fails WP:N and WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 17:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please consider giving this notification to User:Vicvalis instead. He might care about its deletion a bit more than me. I was merely fixing some style mistakes.--EdwardZhao (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Brothers Strause

Not really sure why that link got removed; it's a useful resource. It was previously in the article until it became broken. The location of the page was moved, and it was not 301 redirected. Here's your prove that it once was in the article: http://web.archive.org/web/20090830215243/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_Strause — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvwire (talk • contribs) 18:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice / suggestion. I added the reference where appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvwire (talk • contribs) 21:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

== JT65 and Digital Modes on WSJT (Amateur radio software) page

The link that I added, http://nw7us.us/jt65a.html (I hope that you looked at that resource) is a resource page for the amateur radio community that introduces JT65A and the use of JT65-HF software that enables an amateur radio operator who wants to try JT65A on the shortwave spectrum. The link is not a self-promotion; I am not trying to gain any rankings on search engines. I do not gain anything by the link; if anything, it increases the draw on my bandwidth as it will increase the download of the large PDF files. My effort is to provide these articles and the page as a useful one-stop introduction to help struggling new-comers to the mode. There are a lot of new-comers who do not operate the mode correctly, on the frequencies, and this is partially an effort to educate. The comments so far from visitors is that the page is very useful and has saved a lot of headache to those trying to get started. Therefore, I feel it is not a spamming of Wiki to include this link. It is a true resource as any of the other links already included in the Wiki article. After all, the article cites my CQ Magazine articles, of which I am providing the download PDF resources on my link. Thank you. - NW7US NW7US (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for explaining your edit. If you look at the post right above yours, you will see something similar. I would suggest incorporating relevant info from your site into the article and then using a ref to cite it. This method is preferred over external linking, especially if that page is part of your personal site. Thanks.--EdwardZhao (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Good call

It's nice to see someone making an effort to bring some focus back to the RfA process. 28bytes (talk) 14:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.--EdwardZhao (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

dropping by to say the same. We need more users who aren't afraid to do things like that at RfA. Well done. Swarm 02:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

I disagree with that action. Move it to the talk page or just put a small note in saying edits were removed, but it makes things less transparent and harder to look up when all you have is a lengthy page history, no timestamps, and vague recollections. If someone wanted to complain about Malleus' behavior there, then it would take longer to find the relevant diffs. But I doubt anyone would bother doing that because we need more users who aren't afraid to speak their minds. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok Fetchcomms. By the way, yesterday, I checked back on Richard's RFA and saw some more unnecessary stuff (calling people "moron") from Malleus. I was thinking about starting an ANI or something to get Malleus to stop, but as I went through the rest of his RFA contributions, they are mainly constructive. Maybe he just has something against RC.--EdwardZhao (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

No, you will simply learn that is just Malleus. An AN/I thread would cause a minor shitstorm, as usual. And likely nothing would come of it. I've found that the best thing to do is respect Malleus and when I disagree with him, to disagree silently. Wikipedia can't function without vocal people like him, although I'm sure many would disagree. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Abortion". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by May 20, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you kindly

	Thank you for your support
	Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Good luck!--EdwardZhao (talk) 12:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Abortion, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 14:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello EdwardZhao! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)