User talk:Eightyk

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Eightyk. You have new messages at WP:Requests for feedback#http:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fw.2Findex.php.3Ftitle.3DUser:Eightyk.2FIntelledox_Pty_Ltd.26oldid.3D373004976.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Chevy monte carlo - alt 12:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review of the article[edit]

Okay, so I thought it'd be easier if I wrote a brief review on here instead of somewhere else. To help increase the notability of the article and therefore make it more sutiable for Wikipedia, you need to add reliable references to the article. The best references for a Wikipedia article are from sources that are independent of the article's subject, i.e. official sites are not as good as an unrelated site or news article as a reference. I can see at the moment many of the references you have for the article at the moment are from the company's official site, so I assume that's why the article's been tagged for notability problems by a different user.

I know it can be difficult, but please try and find more sites and news articles that can be used as references for the article. As to the references you have at the moment, they're fine and they can be left there, but a sutiable name would be good, like this:

<ref>[http://www.apple.com/news/23645 Apple news article]</ref>

I hope you understand. If you have any more questions regarding notability or just the article in general, please contact me. Thank you. Chevy monte carlo 11:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant, I have added some references from IT analysts re: the industry and the product. Fingers crossed! Thank you so much!

eightyk (Eightyk (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Intelledox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intelledox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Intelledox[edit]

The article Intelledox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

G11 denied, but this needs a full rewrite. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 14:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]