User talk:Eisai Dekisugi

Welcome!

Hello, Eisai Dekisugi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Prince (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Lazylaces (Talk to me 22:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Lazylaces (Talk to me 22:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss[edit]

It's starting to bother me how you insist on edit warring to implement your changes instead of starting a discussion. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time passed FAC here with gamestudies used in the article. No one raised an issue with it, including Ealdgyth, who specifically checked all sources in the article for reliability. So when you say it's "not considered a reliable source", exactly to whom do you refer? Pagra shtak 15:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"No one raised an issue with it" does not demonstrate the source is reliable. The website is not included in the list of Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. You should demonstrate reliability of the website if you want to add it.--Eisai Dekisugi (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not simply that no one raised an issue with it. Ealdgyth has a reputation as an excellent reliable source checker—she checked this article and had concerns about the reliability of three sources used, and this was not one of them. It is a peer-reviewed journal with clear submission guidelines. The board of reviewers includes university professors, PhDs, etc. Pagra shtak 14:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

clear submission guidelines. This page shows this website use user-submitted information, which shows the website is not reliable.--Eisai Dekisugi (talk) 14:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and here are the submission instructions for the Journal of the American Medical Association. Is it also unreliable? Pagra shtak 14:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of things should be discussed on Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time.--Eisai Dekisugi (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. After you removed the source that had made it through FAC and the main page, I reverted. Following the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, your next step should have been to start a discussion on the talk page, but you did not. Since you are so far the only editor who has raised a reliability issue with the source, I left you a message here to try to get you engaged in a discussion about it. Since you now seem willing to discuss on the talk page, I shall revert the article to the FAC-approved version and you may start a discussion on the talk page if you wish to pursue it further. Pagra shtak 14:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OoT RPGamer & Gamerankings[edit]

Interesting detective work there. As far as I know, the policy only applies to the same review(er), so if Ryan Amos initially gave it a 10 and later changed it to an 8.5, the 10 would be the one that counts. However, in this case, the RPGamer website decided to switch to a different _review_ as the "official staff review." I'm not sure if this would qualify under the same rule, but given OoT's rabid fanbase, it's only natural for the editor, Lee Alessi (who also happens to love OoT himself) to manipulate things in their favour. As shown with the Cubed3 incident, if the game were to suddenly lose 0.5% on Gamerankings, the fanboys throw a fit. You can try to email Lee about it (lee at gamespot dot com) and see what he says. Wikipedian06 (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if I will get a reply from him but I try to email Lee about it. Thanks for your advise.--Eisai Dekisugi (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's good about replying to emails. Wikipedian06 (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What did he say? Wikipedian06 (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncharted sales figures[edit]

Hi, do you have a source for the sales figures you added to the Uncharted article? That would really help, and is really a necessity for such a statement. SynergyBlades (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VH Chartz[edit]

Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Questionable sources. VG Chartz should be avoided since they are not a reliable source. Even though I could have just removed the link again and left a cite tag, I went to the effort of finding a reliable source to put replace them with (the official Zelda website). TJ Spyke 19:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring report[edit]

I've filed a report for edit warring on the recommendation of admin. -Thibbs (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock report[edit]

Just a quick note to say I've filed a sockpuppeting report as well per this suggestion. -Thibbs (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banned[edit]

You are banned under Dr90s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for disruptive editing and original research. Should you wish to appeal the ban you have only two options, one is to place an {{unblock}} request on your original account, the other is to email the arbitration committee. Given your history of sockpuppet use, the chances of either succeeding are slim to nothing. In short, you have blown it. Guy (Help!) 20:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]