User talk:EleOk6e3ih

Welcome![edit]

Hello, EleOk6e3ih, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It is difficult to argue with admin, so I will back off. I would like to note that it is ironic to post to my talk page the 5 pillars of Wikipedia, where Pillar #1 says "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia". I would have added, "Encyclopedia is not a trash bin for promo adds and scammers". But here you go -- you are admin, you know better than me and you can defend any garbage from deletion just to prove your superiority. EleOk6e3ih (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a standard welcome message, issued with {{subst:welcome-retro}}. —Paleo Neonate – 11:52, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:NeuroQuantology. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at NeuroQuantology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 17:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at User talk:Headbomb and elsewhere. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]