User talk:Elementaryreality

This is Elementaryreality's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Bullivant (August 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Bullivant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucy Bullivant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elementaryreality! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucy Bullivant has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucy Bullivant. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Bullivant (September 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Let's look at one sentence: Over the last 25 years Lucy has worked internationally as a consultant providing leadership for world-class organisations and firms in the cultural industries, further education and local government. "Lucy" is very chummy; we call her "Bullivant". "Consultant" is externally linked. (Note WP:ELPOINTS: "With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article.") Worse, the link is to her website; where's the independent referencing? What, if anything, does "world-class" mean here? I'd thought that a "consultant" advised; how does a consultant "provide leadership"?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Bullivant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucy Bullivant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

restitution of feedback box[edit]

I understand that in further editing my draft I should not have deleted the feedback box as it needs to be retained and also contains the resubmit button. I have not done this before and was short of time. I noted the comments and thought I should clear the draft before proceeding. Turns out that was an error. Please would you let me know how I may restitute them, or whether you can personally, so I can further continue to edit the article as per guidance I've been getting.

consultant and leadership[edit]

As a point of clarification, consultants come in many forms and frequently provide leadership eg Sir Norman Foster, the British architect, or specialists working for McKinsey. However I completely take your point about the required neutrality of the text to be achieved in a subsequent draft.

Preparation of the article[edit]

The article in question, which I'll edit further to the best of my ability in line with the comments provided, is not being paid for and there is no conflict of interest.

Remove all the hyperlinks. Some may be valid as references. 31.209.146.55 (talk) 22:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate: external links belong in references, in content notes (which most articles don't have and don't need), in lists of "External links" (which must be short), and perhaps in one or two other places that I can't think of offhand. They don't belong in the main text. Therefore, to take one example, not She regularly gives [https://www.speakersassociates.com/speaker/lucy-bullivant keynotes] globally. but instead She regularly gives keynotes globally.<ref>[reliable, independent source here]</ref>. (Yes, a different source would be greatly preferable, as the source you give is one that advertises her services: it's not independent of her.) ¶ If there is indeed no conflict of interest, then I'm puzzled by how you were able to photograph this portrait. -- Hoary (talk) 22:58, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucy Bullivant[edit]

Hello, Elementaryreality. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucy Bullivant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]