User talk:Emo524
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Luke Harper, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 02:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you![edit]
_by_Ron.jpg)
You are welcome.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Harvey Weinstein, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. In addition, please read Wikipedia's policy on the biographies of living people. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
How was that unconstructive? What I said was true! He just got convicted on one account. It's all over the news. Emo524 (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Your edit included "He is widely regarded as one of the greatest professional rapists of all time" which goes against Wikipedia's guideline on no original research. In addition, the label "sex offender" is already in the opening sentence, there is no need to add "professional rapist" as well. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm ProcrastinatingReader. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Backlash (2020), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Derek Chauvin, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 07:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 03:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
October 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at QAnon, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 22:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Okay, you don't have to give me a list of every bad edit I made No other admin does that. Second, why am I being blocked indefinitely? I already received a warning from Grayfell. You have no reason to block me. You are supposed to give editors a "Final Warning" before blocking them, which you violated. I made some other great edits that you ignored. Why are you only looking at the bad ones? Also What is wrong with discussing conspiracy theories? Can you admins not handle a difference of opinion? And don't use swear words like "moonbatshit," that's unprofessional. Emo524 (talk) 23:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Response? Emo524 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
FYI, I am entitled to believe in Qanon. Are you saying that conspiracy theories cannot be true? What about Nayirah Testimony? [1] You admins don't value freedom of speech. I bet you are a tool George Soros!
Don't worry, I'll be moving to Conservapedia! A website that isn't biased! Goodbye! Emo524 (talk) 00:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's precisely because you believe in QAnon that, to be polite, leaves us with no reason to believe you possess the competency required to be useful. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, and since you don't understand the concept of different time zones and because you decided to use your email for stupid purposes, no more email access. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Aww you're giving me a timeout? You're user page is titled Black Lives Matter. You expect anyone to take you seriously? Rofl you're a government shill! You work for George Soros! Who do you think you are fooling? Is this what Wikipedia has come to? A politically correct Marxist funded website? Emo524 (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a public website! Everyone is entitled to freedom of speech DUMBASS! Emo524 (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't the government, our right to free speech means we don't have to give you a platform, especially since there's so many things that could be said about your mental state (though I won't). Talk page access revoked. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Unblock Request[edit]
>{{unblock|reason=I was blocked by Ian.Thomson after Grayfell already gave me a warning. I have been using Wikipedia for 7 years and I should not be blocked for the reasons as listed. A temporary block is one thing, but indefinitely? I have made some other really great contributions.}} Emo524 (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)