User talk:EnḫeduannaS

Welcome!

Hello, EnḫeduannaS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demian Conrad moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Demian Conrad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there is a question of WP:UPE or WP:COI. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the COI/UPE issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move the article into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:onel5969 OK, I will try to fix the article following your suggestions. Thank you for your cooperation, have a nice day,

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demian Conrad (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable. However, the tone needs cleanup. Please read WP:PEACOCK. Also do you have a WP:COI?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demian Conrad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Demian Conrad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 22:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EnḫeduannaS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 22:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eternal Shadow, thank you for explaining me why this draft has not yet been accepted for publication. Regarding the question you asked me about possible COIs, I hereby confirm that I am not the person in question and have no emotional or financial ties to him or his company, just a great passion for design. As for the text, I would like to improve it so that it can be considered eligible for publication. I have read WP:PEACOCK, I will fix it following the advice on the page. Do you have any suggestion on this point? Like: do you suggest to edit specifically some sections? or in general the tones need to be fixed (less enthusiasm?)? Thanks again for your help and for the invitation to the Teahouse :) best regards,EnḫeduannaS (talk) 16:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The design and graphic artworks sections are the main sections needing tone changes. The tone occasionally praises the subject, with a bit of over enthusiasm. Thanks. Eternal Shadow Talk 21:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eternal Shadow, thanks for the suggestions! I tried to improve the sections "design" and "graphic artworks" by reframing all contents which could seem too enthusiastic. Please let me know if, in your view, the draft is now neutral enough and if, in your opinion, I can submit it again for publication. Thanks a lot! hope to hear from you soon :) EnḫeduannaS (talk) 19:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demian Conrad has been accepted[edit]

Demian Conrad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary, thanks a lot for your help and for the suggestions that have allowed me to understand how to write a better article on Wikipedia. Best wishes :) EnḫeduannaS (talk) 07:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demian Conrad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]