User talk:Energizer07

Acting president

Hi there, I left you a similar message regarding this about six days ago, and I see that message was ignored and deleted. Oh well. You first claimed that George H. W. Bush and Dick Cheney should have the acting president mention in thier respective infoboxes because it abides by Wikipedia policy, but after asking you what policy, you have yet to point me to such policy. After waiting five days for a response from you, I reverted the edits because: 1.) it was one (or in Cheney's case, two) day(s) of an eight year vice presidency (in fact, they weren't even full days) and that is placing undue weight on that single day; 2.) Your edit on Cheney's page only mentioned that he served as acting president (for less than a day) in 2002, but neglected to mention that he also served as acting president (for less than a day) in 2007. Then in this message on my talk page, you make it sound like I am the one who have improperly conducted myself here, which is not the case. You also say that "Cheney was sworn in as President of the US", which is false. President Reagan, and later President GW Bush, signed a piece of paper that authorized Vice President Bush (and later VP Cheney) to serve as acting president while the serving president was under anesthesia. The two men were not sworn in, but rather authorized; that's big difference.

Please do not revert me until you have discussed this issue on either Talk:George H. W. Bush (where there is already a discussion occuring), or Talk:Dick Cheney. Thanks. --Happyme22 (talk) 17:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

Please restrict yourself to one account. It is questionable to engage in an edit war with an editor using one account, and send them a 3RR warning using another. - auburnpilot talk 20:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Ahem, Excuse Me!

You're page is blank. Anything I can do? Tharnton345 (talk) 06:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Colebrooke River, Maguiresbridge.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)