User talk:Entuziazm

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Entuziazm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day, it's been a while since I have last used Wikipedia. I am appealing to be unblocked since I acted immaturely back then, but now that a few months have passed by, I have regretted what I have done and I feel confident that I will no longer cause any disruptions and will abide by the rules. I apologize for any inconveniences that I have caused in the past and I promise that if you decide to unblock me, I will never cause even the slightest problems for this website. Thanks for reading and I hope you will unblock me.

Decline reason:

On multiple occasions, you indicated this account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, that is the end of the line. No further unblock request will be considered for this account. And that's not even getting to the inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What can I do to get unblocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entuziazm (talk • contribs)

Yet again, WP:COMPROMISED applies. This account will not be unblocked. This is the end of the line. --Yamla (talk) 19:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I contact a CheckUser/steward? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entuziazm (talk • contribs)

Don't bother. This account was used to from the get go to make disruptive edits regarding ethnicity and no checkuser or steward who reviews your edits will believe this account was compromised. But you claim that it was, so it can't be unblocked even if one were to buy your story. Which we don't.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Don't bother. This account was used to from the get go to make disruptive edits regarding ethnicity" Entuziazm (talk) That is the exact reason why I am asking to be unbanned since I realized that what I did was disruptive and now that I am experienced, I am never going to let that happen ever again.

"But you claim that it was compromised" Entuziazm (talk) I'll be honest, I just said that at the time to avoid any consequences. The truth is that I had no idea about the rules of editing for Wikipedia as for I was new and thus I fought others trying to prove my claims were right, not theirs (which I now look at with cringe).

This is overly dramatic and refusing to unblock me is unfair and extremely rude. Even when you KNOW that you can give me one more chance, you still refuse. I thought the Wikipedia community was kind, but you guys completely ruin that reputation by not even giving me just one little chance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Entuziazm (talk • contribs)

This is a private website on which you created an account, proceeded to violate our policies and guidelines, and then lied repeatedly when you were correctly blocked. Yet somehow this makes us "unfair and rude". There is a path to an unblock, which is the standard offer, but it will take time and a serious attitude adjustment to be successful. Good luck.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently not eligible for the standard offer until 2023-06-27, and only if this user stops relentlessly evading their block. Note that they may be considered banned, not just blocked, under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "just said that at the time to avoid any consequences." I cannot support the unblock of a liar. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, your best bet is to stop this disruption, cause if you lose TPA, UTRS is not available to you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #72608[edit]

is closed. I've banned them from UTRS, so please ping me if they lose TPA> -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

guys I've changed for the better now please let me back Entuziazm (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

😢😢😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

please I just want everything to back to normal Entuziazm (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Yup, TPA was just pulled. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shocked! Shocked, I say! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I may be overdramatic, but the UTRS ban expires 2023-11-24 16:46:33. If, in the mean time, you could make 500+ constructive edits over the six months on some other Wikipedia, it would weigh in your favor if you request unblocking. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting WP:CBAN -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed ban evasion as StraightWhiteMale69 to post the same racist garbage. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, that restarts the counter. You are 0 days without block evasion. You ae not eligible for consideration of unblocking until after March 29, 2023. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess claims of change were somewhat exaggerated. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]