User talk:EpsomGentleman

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stoneleigh, Surrey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I may try to word the lead diffently although it may suffice as it is Epsomturd (talk) 23:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm an administrator here. Two things: Firstly, please only add content that you can substantiate with Reliable Sources and, secondly, we are likely to consider your username to be a tad disruptive, or perhaps intended to offend or intimidate. To avoid undue attention on every edit you may make from now on, I recommend you request a username change at WP:Username change. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the name now (may take a short time to be approved). alex gurteen recreation ground has no refs but is on google maps. May just have to leave it out w/o any other sources. It is only a smallish patch (2 acres) of open space. Thanks Epsomturd (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and thanks on both counts. Nick Moyes (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to James Franco have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: James Franco was changed by EpsomGentleman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8564 on 2021-12-24T21:40:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my last few edits. I a bit drunk tonight. I will stop now EpsomGentleman (talk) 22:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EpsomGentleman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I relise my edits on here were inappropriate and disruptive, apologies fir that. I wish to edit constructively again. Sorry for using another account instead of this one, but I think it demonstrates that I wish to edit constructively. I will not do sich joke edits anymore EpsomGentleman (talk) 09:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Trying to spin socking into a positive is an... interesting, if unpersuasive, argument.("Sorry I stole from your store, but it means that I like your products!!! I'll buy them next time, promise!") In any event, you don't describe any specific, substantive edits you want to make, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.