User talk:Equal Progress

Jamahiriya el-Mukhabarat[edit]

Hi
Would you have a source handy to confirm that Jamahiriya el-Mukhabarat is a Libyan intelligence service? The external link to GlobalSecurity.org doesn't mention the name, and I had no luck at Google news, but that's often difficult since transliterations tend to vary. Could you add one so that it isn't a completely unreferenced stub?
Thanks, Amalthea 19:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's from the article on Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. There are a lot of different transliterations on the Web, this one seems like the most standard. Equal Progress (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, can you give me one that yields some google news hits? Or some other reliable source? I noticed that it was linked in the Megrahi even before you started the article, but I'm surprised that I didn't find anything on the web. Is there some Libyan government webpage you know that mentions it? Amalthea 08:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued on my talk page, per your request. Amalthea 22:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Am Flight 103[edit]

Hi
Consensus seems to have shifted in favor of including the link. I would ask of you that you respect it, just as you asked of others to respect your removing it when the link was in question. If you have issues with the link title, please just change it, and if it is reverted, discuss it on the talk page. And while it is common sense to avoid misleading link titles, I don't think this is the case here.
Kind regards, Amalthea 11:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, consensus. Looking at the talk page, I see four editors arguing in favor, plus one editor who added it back with a rationale, while only you argue against it without offering a tangible, policy-based argument. That is pretty clear cut. If you still dispute it, I would invite you to open a section at the administrator's noticeboard and ask for someone uninvolved to evaluate the discussion, or to bring it up at the noticeboard for external links. Please, do not remove it again. Doing so would be a clear case of edit warring, which can quickly lead to a block. If you are convinced the link is inappropriate, the only way for you to make sure that it stays out of the article is to convince other editors anyway, and to find a consensus against it. As I said, you asked other editors to leave it out when several editors voiced concerns about it, including me. What I'm asking now is that you extend the same courtesy you asked of others. I would be sad if you didn't.
Regards, Amalthea 23:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]