User talk:Ericwong

Welcome!

Hello, Ericwong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BhaiSaab ^talk 19:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ericwong, please do not add unsourced material (like in Muslim Brotherhood) to and do not remove sourced material (like in Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais) from the articles. It may be considered vandalism. Please read The five pillars of Wikipedia about what is Wikipedia and how to contribute. Thank you, --Ioannes Pragensis 13:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. There is consensus to keep the images of Muhammad. Please see the discussion page. seicer | talk | contribs 22:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. RaseaC (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk 1 7 22:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I didn't see the prohibition of removing the image on the discussion page prior to removing them. After I saw it in the discussion page, I apologized for doing so, even before receiving this notification of being blocked.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Okay, I am going to assume good faith here as you do not have a edit history of page blanking removal of content or vandalism. Please do not remove that image from the article, as stated on the discussion page.

Request handled by: Tiptoety ^talk 23:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiptoety ^talk 23:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ericwong, your reasoning doesn't seem very sincere. In this edit, you deleted an image which was right below a warning not to do so. Then you deleted another image here. That tells me that you ignored the warning. Frotz (talk) 00:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad[edit]

Please STOP your edits to Muhammad. You are destroying links and damaging much else by changing all occurences of Muhammed to that larger phrase. Merely by checking with preview you should have seen how much damage you were doing. I have reverted all three of your latest edits, in order to restore the article. Shenme (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Versa geek 05:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please stop adding the ridiculously biased sentence to the lead of December 2008 Gaza Strip airstrikes, as anyone who can put two words together can see it violates numerous Wikipedia policies. JuJube (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Depictions of Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]