User talk:Erik1980

Image for Deletion[edit]

You nominated Image:EmilyOsment1.jpg for deletion but you didn't start a discussion on images and media for deletion or any kind of reason. The picture is released under creative commons. What's the deal? --Phoenix Hacker 05:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, forgot the discussion page there... On Dutch Wikipedia we have a bot that automatically notifies every user, so I guess I'm starting to get used to that ;)

About the picture: Although it was released here, I came across this same picture on some other pages (e.g. [1]). Not just her at the same event, but I mean exactly this same picture. Should my assumption be true, this creative commons tag should not have been there in the first place. I have now contacted the uploader on his talk page (which I happened to see you did, too) so now I hope we will soon know more.

Is contacting him through his talk page enough? Or do I need to add something to the image's discussion, too? Erik1980 07:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That picture has the same background but it doesn't look like the same picture to me at all. It's reasonable to assume there were other photographers taking pictures. This alone isn't rational to delete the picture. --Phoenix Hacker 07:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:EmilyOsment1.jpg[edit]

Hello there! I apologize for the fact that I haven't been on Wikipedia in a while. I had to go down to Santa Monica and stay for a few days :) Gotta say I love the weather out here. Anyway, you can find our official site at santamonicanews.info. Since we just got our web presence this year, we are currently under contract with GoDaddy to provide a free hosting service while our developer builds the SQL databases we need. Once that is done (estimated within 1 month), we will transfer it over to our new server, and go from there. As far as updates, our webmaster is currently building the site up as we speak, and he usually updates the live copy once or more a week. Eventually, we'll have an online edition of our paper. Hope this helps, and talk to you later! Imageboy1 06:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joodse maanden[edit]

(in Dutch) Hoi Erik, ik heb geantwoord op mijn pagina, maar dan erg algemeen omdat er nog meer vragen waren. Neem er alsjeblieft geen aanstoot aan. Ik wens hier ook geen nieuwe discussies over te beginnen. Ik zie nl.wikipedia als verleden tijd. Het spijt me dat ik het nog een laatste kans had gegeven. Met vriendelijke groet, gidonb 19:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laat me s.v.p. even weten als je het gelezen dan archiveer ik het direct. Toekomstige verzoeken verwijs ik dan naar het archief. Ik heb geen zin in in nieuwe discussies. gidonb 03:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voor de zekerheid maar helemaal gearchiveerd. gidonb 19:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt voor je heldere, verhelderende uitleg op jouw OP. Jammer dat het zo moet gaan, maar ik kan me je punten erg goed voorstellen. Tijdens editwars is het blijkbaar té makkelijk moddergooien in plaats van een gedegen discussie aangaan, en blijkbaar (tot mijn schrik) past ook discriminatie in dat rijtje... Jammer, en ik hoop terdege dat ooit aan jouw "eisen-lijstje" zal worden voldaan (m.a.w. dat we je ooit weerzien). Zo niet, alle goeds op en.wiki!!! Vriendelijke groeten, Erik1980 20:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meestal heb ik juist niet aan de editwars meegedaan, maar werd ik dan toch geblokkeerd volgens een soort parallelprincipe of wegens ongeduld, nonchalant verwijzend naar andere blokkades (dat ging dus ineens heel snel en makkelijk na 3 jaar zonder zulke problemen...). Er werden ook constant minachtende boodschappen over mij geplaatst door moderators. Het geheel maakte een uiterst onrespectvolle indruk tegenover mij als gewone gebruiker (dat bedoel ik met discriminatie), die voor de laatste keer tevergeefs probeerde een positieve bijdrage te leveren aan de kwaliteit en het neutrale karakter van de encyclopedie onder slechter dan onmogelijke condities. [2] De laatste keer werd dan zelfs mijn klacht door de bekende persoon gevandaliseerd (na constant belagen van mijn gebruikerspagina's en bijdragen, alles geraakte daardoor buiten gebruik) en werd ik direct daarna ook nog eens geblokkeerd. Dat was de laatste bijdrage en zal het vast blijven! Er moeten toch ergens grenzen zijn en ik heb al spijt dat ik daarmee te soepel was. Vandaar mijn voorwaarde mij a priori gelijk te schakelen met andere gebruikers voordat ik zelfs nog maar een letter daar schrijf, als ik er zelfs dan nog toe bereid ben. Maar maak je verder geen zorgen, ik ben opgelucht dat ik weg ben! Dankjewel voor de goede wensen en jij ook het beste! Vriendelijke groeten, gidonb 02:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zweeds legerfiets[edit]

Regarding the article on the Swedish army bicycle, the interwiki links you provided point to articles concerning the civilian bicycle inspired by the m/42. In addition, the article on the Dutch wikipedia appears to say that the Kronan company existed in 1940. That is not true. Kronan, the bicycle company, has only existed since 1997. I can only read Dutch, not write it, so could you correct that for me? --Adamrush 23:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done! And thanks for the explanation - Erik1980 14:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Vossenveld[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Vossenveld, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vossenveld. Thank you. A ecis^Brievenbus 21:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my ban[edit]

You know, I support admins on commons, who also hold the view that the version with the cut off edge of the weeds are better.

And do not be surprised that the curse, when the Dutch Wikipedia is so zabedněnců who ten reverting my edit, it will stop any man komunikce fun.

You do not tighten so much that after a while you will be there no change.

A change to refer to the page, just because you do not like to edit a comment?

Indeed, dig your own grave, and just because it is not it forward.

Then do not be surprised that Wikipedia has a considerable outflow of the authors and the site are poor level.

Moreover, as some may have as much attitude oven, pětkárt revertovat my editing just because he wanted? How can I work when I will still likely be editingwar ban? How do I enforce its version of the article, when one oven to keep reverting and the other without jakoliv thought, give me a ban?

User:Fredy.00 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.48.153.172 (talk) 08:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you voor your bericht. Unfortunately I have geen enkele clue what you are talking about, omdat je een automated translation gebruikt.

Whatever you are trying to say, please ask or say it in English, German (Deutsch), French (Francais) or Dutch (Nederlands), but not in some strange combination of several languages. My Dutch talk page would be a better place to talk to me as I hardly ever check this English talk page (only when I happen t have to make an edit on this version of Wikipedia). Thanks!

Kind groeten / vriendelijke regards, Erik1980 (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NEC[edit]

Ik weet niet wat jij hebt gezien, maar Jérémy De Vriendt is gehuurd van KV Mechelen en niet gekocht, staat op de officiële site van NEC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.236.31 (talk) 11:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

En Boekhoorn is de eigenaar van NEC, nou goed?

Het probleem is dat waarheden combineert met je eigen fantasie, waardoor het onmogelijk te geloven is dat correcte dingen ook echt correct zijn. Oftewel: Zolang je een hoop onzin blijft plaatsen zoals je hier en op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia, draai ik alles terug als ik niet héél zeker weet dat je gelijk hebt. En bij weer een onwaarheid wordt op nl:wikipedia je blokkade verdubbeld en hier je waarschuwing verhoogd (waardoor je uiteindelijk ook hier geblokkeerd zult worden). Vriendelijke groeten, Erik1980 (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Paraskevi[edit]

Thank you very much for the picture. This article really needed it. If you have time, check also Vikos-Aoos National Park. There is also an ongoing nomination to be promoted to a-class on the talkpage.Alexikoua (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Do check out the Category:Monastery of Saint Paraskevi on Commons with more pictures of the monastery. I'm not an expert at all, just a coincidental passer-by who loved the place... So if you find a more appropriate picture, just do whatever you like with it! Best, Erik1980 (talk) 20:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page[edit]

Why did you delete my whole page? Yes, it was translated with a translator, but I understand Dutch grammar and sentence structure, and I was working on fixing it only to click submit to be told that the page had been deleted. Maybe wait at least two minutes before you delete a page that someone's working on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wesrater (talk • contribs) 13:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The second reason for deletion was the fact that the article's topic does not meet the notability guidelines, neither on Dutch Wikipedia nor on English Wikipedia. I have therefore proposed deletion on this Wikipedia as well.

Please use "~~~~" (without the brackets) to sign your remarks on any talk page. Kind regards, Erik1980 (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mojo Barrier[edit]

The article Mojo Barrier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable product/company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Erik1980. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristal Kola for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristal Kola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristal Kola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 18:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]