User talk:Erniecohen

Welcome!

Hello, Erniecohen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingturtle (talk) 14:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verified Concurrent C (February 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Verified Concurrent C and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Erniecohen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verified Concurrent C (March 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Verified Concurrent C and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 04:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buenos Aires affair[edit]

Some years ago I planned to improve our coverage of the B.A. affair "everywhere"--about 10 people pages and presumably Bermuda Bowl. You may be interested in Alan Truscott#Buenos Aires affair for its subsection guide to latterday New York Times coverage (which violates good form as defined for our biographies). I did provide coverage at Ralph Swimer but did little or nothing elsewhere.

For what it's worth, we now have nine of the 10 pages Terence Reese; Boris Schapiro; Jeremy Flint; Dimmie Fleming; Rixi Markus; Ralph Swimer; Alan Truscott; Dorothy Hayden (Truscott); B. Jay Becker; John Gerber (bridge) --where I would call all but Flint, Fleming, and Markus principals. The last two pages are new and we say nothing at all of this matter, yet. For Dorothy Hayden we say one line without a source.

--P64 (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Verified Concurrent C[edit]

Hello, Erniecohen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Verified Concurrent C".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]