User talk:Erudite Manatee
Welcome!
Hello, Erudite Manatee, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 23:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Everest copyedits[edit]
While a lot of your edits to 2014 Mount Everest avalanche were productive and have been retained, other were not helpful. For example, you may prefer to remove "the" wherever possible, but standard writing uses the definitely article where appropriate. You may prefer American English, but the article is written in British English. Per WP:ENGVAR, the version of English chosen by the article's early editors should be retained. Both Ericoides and myself have explicitly denied that certain edits were improvements. Other editors have implicitly denied their usefulness by undoing various changes. Wikipedia works on consensus which means sometimes you won't get your preferred version of an article. Instead the majority preference should be respected, which in this case means using "the" and other English you may consider wordy. Thanks for understanding, --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Guantanamo Bay detention camp dead link removal[edit]
I put back the dead links you've removed. They shouldn't be removed without replacing them with new ones. By removing them, you're making it look like many of these issues are now unreferenced, making them subject to easy removal. Even when a paragraph has multiple references, sometimes those references only support part of the claim. You can't know without seriously reading them that the ones remaining will continue to support the paragraph the way that the old link used to. Besides that, dead links are still useful for tracking down information. -- Randy2063 (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC) How are dead links useful when tracking down information? If the link is dead, that means there is nothing to see and the link is useless. Whoever was responsible for posting now-dead links can re-link to archived content on the Wayback Machine, but don't waste readers' patience by re-posting dead links. It makes the subject irrelevant without active links readers can view. You might as well post content without any references at all if the only support for them is dead links.
Per this, you probably misread the internal link. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Erudite Manatee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Erudite Manatee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |