User talk:Ervinn

Think (book) criticism section[edit]

Please see Talk:Think (book) for my comments regarding the criticism section you added. KevinPuj 18:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:HoldOnToYourKids.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HoldOnToYourKids.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SurvavalOfTheSickest.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SurvavalOfTheSickest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HoldOnToYourKids.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HoldOnToYourKids.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epigenetics[edit]

Hi Ervinn. In the article on epigenetics, you appear to be equating epigenetic inheritance and junk DNA. I don't believe that this is true, but I'm no expert. Can you supply sources for this? Cheers, --Plumbago (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sheppard Centre(Toronto)[edit]

The article Sheppard Centre(Toronto) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recreated material from Sheppard Centre. Pure directory entry without notability claim.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pgallert (talk) 11:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hold on to Your Kids (book)[edit]

The article Hold on to Your Kids (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible advert for a book. Co-authored only. Has a couple of routine reviews and fails at WP:NBOOK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smart Moves[edit]

The article Smart Moves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very promotional and no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlueWhale89 (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]