User talk:Etaripcisum

December 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at Quantity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit you have reached 4RR. Did you even look at the article on property? It describes legalisms in no way relevant to quantity. Just plain Bill (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ElKevbo (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

My apologies, but that accusation is rather vague; were you referring to my edit on “Knowledge”? If so, please elaborate as I’m very new to editing and don’t know a lot of the rules yet. Thank you. Etaripcisum (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was referring to that edit. No, we're not stupid and we know you're trying to play a game. Stop it. ElKevbo (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]