User talk:FLuca89
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, FLuca89! Thank you for your contributions. I am ZfJames and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 02:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm ZfJames. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Oyster River High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 02:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
How do I cite it? FLuca89 (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- There's actually no need to add the information to individual high school articles. The only way someone would be confused about "ORHS" would be if they searched on that abbreviation. If you do so, you wind up at the ORHS disambiguation page. Problem solved. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2014 YA50, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a source. Please develop or the page will be cancelled.Xx236 (talk) 13:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I just turned 2017 TC1 and 2017 MM5 into redirects, as per WP:NASTRO and WP:DWMP. I also revised (15700) 1987 QD, another article you recently created. Maybe it is better to edit some existing minor-planet articles before creating new ones, don't you think? If you need feedback for your article(s) in the draftspace just post on my talk page and I'll be glad to help. Rfassbind – talk 09:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List the tallest building in the americas[edit]
Hello FLuca89,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List the tallest building in the americas for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, List of tallest buildings in the United States, among others.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 03:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Etzedek24. An edit that you recently made to List the tallest building in the americas seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 03:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Come to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hello! FLuca89,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
|
— Gorthian (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of known Spacs Debris[edit]
Hello FLuca89,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of known Spacs Debris for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Anaxial (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of John Washington (1475) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Washington (1475) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Washington (1475) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 19:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Robert Washington (1545 - 1620 for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Washington (1545 - 1620 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Washington (1545 - 1620 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 20:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Richard Walker (astronomer) moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Richard Walker (astronomer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2014 YA50[edit]
Hello, FLuca89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2014 YA50".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Richard Walker (astronomer)[edit]
Hello, FLuca89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Walker".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)