User talk:Fact reporter1

Fact reporter1, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Fact reporter1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

Hi, I'm concerned that you may be using several accounts to edit the same articles; see Fact reporter (talk · contribs), and guidelines at WP:MULTIPLE. Thank you, 76.248.151.159 (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I'm concerned that you have not responded to the above, and reverted the redirect of a marginally significant television personality. I'd suggest you begin to use the talk pages and edit summaries to explain rationale. In the meantime I've restored the redirect-- the references you supplied are either not acceptable or don't mention the subject pf the article, and a Google News search turns up no sources at all. 76.248.151.159 (talk) 10:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I would like to report Vandalism on the page Hannah Martin Duarte - a vandal reverted her personal page to the Big Rich Texas page and removed her credits on the Big Rich Texas page along with her Wiki link - The reverts were done by an unknown user. The vandal also vandalized the Pamela Martin Duarte page and remove substantial tv credits from her page as well. 3 pages are being vandalized here.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fact reporter1 (talk • contribs)

What is the process to remove one editor and only use a single editor. We were under the impression a separate editor page was necessary for each page created. Had no intention of doubling up on an IP. Recommended remedy respectfully requested.

July 2013[edit]

Hello, Fact reporter1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pamela Martin Duarte, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Ryulong (琉竜) 18:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this IP editor is raising an important point. If you are the operator of the account "Fact reporter", please stick with only one account. And these articles do not show that the person is notable and lack reliable sources. Simply being a member of the cast of some reality show on a cable network does not make the person notable and allow them to be covered on the English Wikipedia outside of the scope of the show they appeared on.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Yes I work for the individuals in order to create blogs, web pages and wiki page upkeep. They are television celebrities and have hired my group to oversee all. The problem is that a vandal is removing pertinent information about the page owners for no apparent reason. The vandal is also removing the wiki links from other pages mentioned above.

The page is for a notable person who is a marketing executive, philanthropist, tv personality and novelist - its contents are notable and reliable if the vandalism isn't removing sources and removing pertinent information. Thank you for assisting me. We will only use one editor for our pages we understand the IP editor's point.

We have added a verifiable source using the New York Times per your request for a reliable source per the new rules. Thank you.

Thank you for disclosing this information. Now, let me inform you of some of the issues this presents.

Wikipedia does not allow paid editing as it goes against our core principle of neutrality. As you are receiving a financial incentive to produce and promote this article, it means you are not neutrally presenting this information which goes against one of our core policies. You should not be offering any sort of Wikipedia-related service to your clients. The volunteer editors that make up the Wikipedia community are very good at preventing vandalism so no one needs to be paid to guard a page. Additionally, Wikipedia and its community of editors have developed a set of guidelines for inclusion. In all honesty, as someone who has been on this website for 7 years, it does not appear that your clients meet these guidelines.

Wikipedia also does not allow for groups to be in control of accounts. If only one individual is acting as the operator of this account, then that is fine. But if someone else logs in with this account then that is against our rules.

So please, do not edit Wikipedia with multiple accounts, do not allow multiple people to access a single account, and do not edit Wikipedia when you have a financial incentive or other vested interest at stake.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I am not a paid person and I am a neutral contributor - I know of the persons that we have discussed as they live in my city however - I am only creating the page for the purpose of what Wikipedia stands for. It is to my dismay that the pages I have created for the purpose of Wikipedia useage and within the guidelines are being vandalized by several IP addresses that are part of a mail server group which leads me to believe foul play is involved. The IP's that use 204.602.032.27, 151.164.129.3, 204.602.03227,151.164.129.2,151.164.112.18,151.164.129, 151.164.61 should be blocked and reported for vandalism.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fact reporter1 (talk • contribs)

You said before that you work for the individuals in question. This means that you are not neutral. None of those items you have provided to me are in any way IP addresses, either. No one has been vandalizing the pages. Please see WP:VANDAL for what is and is not considered vandalism.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is it written that someone who has been appointed and is neutral cannot write a page? Any what is the reason for your adding a biased blogger's report that is under legal investigation for cyber harassment and the parties that are mentioned e.g. Bonnie Blossman who is being investigated for cyber bullying be placed on a neutral page about a person?

Also the IP addressed provided are part of a group server and are indeed vandalism

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest: "Do not edit Wikipedia to promote your own interests, or those of other individuals or of organizations, including employers. Do not write about these things unless you are certain that a neutral editor would agree that your edits improve Wikipedia." Again, you are not a neutral editor.

I have not added a "biased blogger's report". You added the citation to that New York Times news article. I read it and changed the page to reflect the actual contents that were presented.

Redact your comment about Mrs. Blossman as it is against WP:BLP to post any defamatory information concerning a living person anywhere on Wikipedia if you do not have something to back up the claim.

And none of those IP addresses have ever editted Wikipedia. Several are still not even IP addresses.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. Please participate in the current discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This relates to the use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes by multiple accounts, as well as making inappropriate claims of vandalism. 76.248.151.159 (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Fact reporter1. You have new messages at Talk:Pamela Martin Duarte.
Message added 18:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]