Jump to content

User talk:Fadsel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fadsel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Lakun.patra (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Draft:Sticky Bubble concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sticky Bubble, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sticky Bubble (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lakun.patra was:
Need 3rd party refs to show notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lakun.patra (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fadsel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lakun.patra (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sticky Bubble (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Fadsel. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Other writers have edited the draft causing it to do a reference error , I used the Visual Editor , so its kinda impossible to make an error unless its a bug from Visual Editor , About My username ... whats wrong with it? , I use it all the time. It just happens that its the same through out , it Has nothing to do with advertisement ... You declined my submission because of my username? Now I cannot even comment or request an appeal , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edgar181 has blocked me completely , if you dont like my username that much , Kindly change it to fadsel123 with numbers on the end ... Sorry If you feel offended , But still , Take it easy man! Its just a username. Cheers --Fadsel (talk) 07:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The username "fadsel123" just as clearly relates to the business that you are promoting as does "Fadsel", so that does not address the username issue. As is clearly explained in the message above about the deletion nomination, the draft was deleted because it was promotional, not because of your username. Although the blocking administrator chose to give you a block message which emphasised the username problem, that message did also say "You should also ... be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose", but you don't appear to have taken that on board. If you are unblocked and continue to edit to promote your business or its products, you are likely to be blocked again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sticky Bubble[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sticky Bubble, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Wasell(T) 07:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello there Wasell [[1]] , I see you have marked the article itself for fast deletion , Nice!
How Can I contest the nomination if I am blocked? How is this even fair? A wana be wikipedian from Africa , Cheers. --Fadsel (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC) --Fadsel (talk) 07:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can't, not while blocked. Given your username and the name of the company which created that game, this looks like a straight-forward example of WP:PROMO, anyway. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I requested you to change the username , I 've being working on the draft for over 6 months ,
An Email came saying that i need to finish my draft and I should submit it , Well I did ... And Now its deleted :( And I dont have any backup , can I atleast get the draft so that i can

  • add to Wikia ,
  • or perhaps everipedia - I heard the folks over there they don't require Notability,

With all that being said ... You have problems with my username, right? Simply change my username ,
Why do you feel the need of deleting the draft itself without even giving me a chance to edit it again ,throwing all the negative feedbacks after blocking me from editing , How can I Fix it while being blocked? Cheers--Fadsel (talk) 13:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request and does not discuss the reasons for your block. Huon (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply[edit]

Hi, thanks for email. Wikipedia ia not free advertising for your company's product. The draft was pure spam, even down to the ® symbol. It's not our job to protect your registered mark . It's clear that if you are unblocked you will just continue to promote your company's product from a new account. Unless you agree not to do so, and stick to that agreement, you will not be unblocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Jim, Thank you for your reply.

If I get unblocked will I be able to improve the article from where I left off?

Or I should start from the beginning?

Since I am a newbie here , Can you suggest edits on the draft so that it reaches wikipedia's standard?

I tried reading different articles on that topic here on wikipedia , And thats what i came up with so far .

In the first place , I thought by submitting the draft , I will get suggestions on how to improve perhaps remove this , or this , perhaps add this ... Well ... I Decided to submit it for review and then it got deleted with negative feedbacks. ( Its not helpful :( )

And I 've seen alot of articles which are worse than mine , some have only one paragraph. With self edited blog as the reference.

Kindly Assist.

Cheers

--Fadsel (talk) 15:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, you have not proposed a username that meets the username policy. Secondly, it's obvious that you only want to promote your product. I do not see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Username Change Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello there , Can you change my username to fuat instead ,
and for the record i do not want to promote product ,
this is the first time i am writing a wiki thats why it sounds more like advertisement , but will improve with your help ... Cheers --Fadsel (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Although you have proposed a username that appears to meet the username policy, you have not said that you will not edit this article, only that you will write a less promotional version. You will not be allowed to edit that article. I do not see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sticky Bubble - An Android Game - Draft Recovery[edit]

Can I have this draft back so that i can improve it ,
I am sorry that you feel that i want to make it less promotional

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fadsel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since the username I 've requested is available , can you change it so that I can continue with the draft ,
perhaps you can suggest edits , add anything useful e.t.c ,

Insisting that it will be promotional is not helping ,
Suggesting that ... remove this and that is helpful ,
Cheers --Fadsel (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please promote your game elsewhere. Talk page access revoked for WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin, this user has already had five unblock reviews. They clearly don't understand the problem here. If you decline the unblock review, please also revoke access to the talk page as we are just going around in circles. --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fadsel&oldid=1087687179"