User talk:Fairgeek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Yale has been accepted[edit]

Caroline Yale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 08:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecile de Wentworth has been accepted[edit]

Cecile de Wentworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

StarryGrandma (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science[edit]

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "physical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science[edit]

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
a Year of Science initiative

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

EB1911 attribution[edit]

You created an article on Caroline Yale at 07:13, 12 January 2015. You included the template {{EB1911}}, but no article name for that source. As you do not cite EB1911 it is impossible to tell which text if any came from that source (Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition). I see that you included a link to a more recent edition of Encyclopædia Britannica but that is under copyright. If you did not copy any text from the 11th edition please remove the template. If you did the please move the template up into an inline citation and include the article name (as title=article name). -- PBS (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you do not have the article name for the NIE entry please remove it from the external links section. -- PBS (talk) 15:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clearing that up.

Now that there are a lot more EB1911 pages on Wikisource, I am looking at a category called Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with no article parameter trying to supply article titles. Which was my reason for contacting you earlier today.

You created an article on Cecile de Wentworth at 08:17, 15 January 2015 like your creation of the article on Caroline Yale you included the attribution templates {{EB1911}} and {{NIE}}, but you did not add an article title to either nor did you use them to support inline citations. If you did not copy any text from either of those sources please remove them, but if you did then please incude the article title

-- PBS (talk) 22:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)[edit]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list[edit]

Hi Fairgeek! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]