User talk:Faith Buyaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello,Faith Buyaki , and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! AKibombo (AfLIA) (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your Sandbox[edit]

Is a semi-private, semi=public space. Means that it will not be 'found' by searches with search engines or a searth within Wikipedia, but any editor can go to your User page, click on View history, then click on your contributions to see all of your contributions everywhere. P.S. Do not put copyright protected content into your Sandboc (or anywhere) with the thought that you will then paraphrase the content and delete the original. Do that away from Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you![edit]

Nice to meet you today! Please stay in touch, I'm always happy to help! Lajmmoore (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Mutei Kyallo[edit]

Hello Faith Buyaki, I've cleaned up a little your article and moved it to the right article title from Living person Biography to Betty Mutei Kyallo. Continue to expand your article. Happy editing.--Wakowako (talk) 10:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Mutei Kyallo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Betty Mutei Kyallo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Faith Buyaki,
I moved your article to Draft space because I thought it was going to be tagged for deletion if I didn't. I recommend you continue to improve it and submit it to Articles for Creation for review when you think it is in good enough shape not be to be tagged for deletion.
If you have questions about article creation or Draft space, I encourage you to bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you help and assistance. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nairobi Half Life[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits to Nairobi Half Life, you added multiple links to "Nairobi". As per MOS:LINKONCE we generally only link the first occurrence of a term. I left the first link in the article, but removed links for the following occurrences. Thank you. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 06:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Faith Buyaki! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sandbox, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikita Kering (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Cannot simply state that the subject "has an angelic voice". Quite possible notable, but please replace the "net worth" sources, which are not useful in establishing notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Faith Buyaki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nikita Kering has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nikita Kering. Thanks! Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 23:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikita Kering (December 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No improvement made.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Xclusivzik (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikita Kering has been accepted[edit]

Nikita Kering, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Mutei Kyallo has been accepted[edit]

Betty Mutei Kyallo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 06:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Kyallo[edit]

Congratulations, Faith Buyaki, on creating your first article. You've made a pretty good start but particularly for biographies of living people, there should be a reference to a secondary source in each paragraph. Perhaps you can fill the gaps with additional sources from local newspapers or business journals. If you intend to write more articles about women, you might like to become a member of wp:Women in Red where we are trying to reduce the gender gap. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roots party Kenya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Roots party Kenya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please provide references that are independent of subject. Also, the manifesto should not be copy and pasted but summarized according to reliable sources.Slywriter (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Slywriter, I have edited my article to include references thank you. Faith Buyaki (talk) 12:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roots party Kenya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roots party Kenya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Justina Wamae[edit]

Hello Faith Buyaki,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Justina Wamae for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justina Wamae moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Justina Wamae, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ponyobons mots 16:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justina Wamae (November 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Subject hasn't been elected to any position yet. See WP:NPOL. Three of the sources are duplicates, so no general notability established either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pulse Influencer Awards for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pulse Influencer Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulse Influencer Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peninah Malonza[edit]

Hi @Faith Buyaki: How goes it? I reviewed your Peninah Malonza. Nice wee article but you really put more references into the article. Some sections are unsources and I was planning to send it to draft. Two sources is insufficient. Hope that helps? scope_creepTalk 14:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Justina Wamae[edit]

Information icon Hello, Faith Buyaki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justina Wamae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Justina Wamae[edit]

Hello, Faith Buyaki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Justina Wamae".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roots Party Kenya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roots Party Kenya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Faith_Buyaki&oldid=1212508670"