User talk:Felize

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DirectEdge 00:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Australian Security Intelligence Organisation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DirectEdge 00:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

DirectEdge please cease and desist vandalising my contributions under the guise of your vacuous charges of "appears to be vandalism" and "unconstructive edits" and "your edits appear to constitute vandalism". These are not arguments. If you wish to defend your charges then please engage in Discussion. It is a fact that ASIO has drafted secretive policy for the DoD to silence the 9/11 Truth Movement. We know that thanks to Wikiscanner. This is not in the insterests of Australians. This is only in the interest of the criminals who orchestrated the false-flag attacks of 9/11. http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/pms-wikipedia-whiteout/2007/08/23/1187462441687.html Felize

Felize: Wikipedia is not the place for conspiracy theories. However, if you do have anything constructive to add, then please do so in accordance with Wikipedia's policy of citing your sources. DirectEdge 01:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

DirectEdge I did cite the source - http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/pms-wikipedia-whiteout/2007/08/23/1187462441687.html FRONT PAGE OF THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD AND SYNDICATED IN ABOUT 20 OTHER MAINSTREM CHANNELS. Does bold type work for you? Or shall I just humbly cite the citation once again in case you missed it for the third time? Also, false-flag terrorism is not a conspiracy theory. Its declassified in the Library of Congress FACT. I linked to its Wikipedia entry. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag#Terrorism_and_false_flag_operations So how can I be unWiki when I'm linking to the Wiki entry for false-flag state sponsored terrorism? Which part of STATE-sponsored don't you get? Which part of citation don't you understand? And further, you are attacking me with a Wiki Bot. There is also actual legislation where the Security Intelligence Group can legally break into a persons home and install spyware on their computer without their knowledge and without them having comitted any crime. Simply for being a political party or activist. And that is to 'protect' Australia is it? Which University citations would you like detailing how the FBI's subversive secretive activities is anti-democratic because it perverts the body politic without the body politic knowing its being perverted? And so who do you think this ASIO is working for then? Australians? lol. Please. How much they paying you? I can cite away if you like, but thus far you have totally ignored my due diligence, such efforts are likely wasted. Which part of secretive organisation don't you get? The part where you actually cannot have the authority to claim to know what they do because there is no transparency? How about this one: Rex Tomb, Chief of Publicity, FBI, states in July 2006 that the reason the FBI havn't indicted Osama Bin Ladin for the attacks of 9/11 is because they don't have any evidence connecting him to the attacks of 9/11. Google it. Citations are wasted on you. I'll be back. And I know how to use a Bot too if thats the way you want it. PS: All DoD will face justice for this one day. The 9/11 Truth Movement will never surrender. How about this: Former NIST Chief of Fire Safety Science rejects NIST's WTC investigation conclusions and calls for an independent review. He also tells a packed out audience at the World Fire Safety Convention to investigate the WTC collapses for themselves and approach the problem "like conspiracy theorists" (this is two months ago): http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm By the way, the Official/Mythical 9/11 story about 20 hijackers is actually a theory of a conspiracy. It has never been substantiated to be true. The controlled demolition theory however has been exhaustively proven. Felize 01:00+t, 11 November 2007 (UTC)