User talk:Fiachaire

Are you having a pleasant Sunday?

Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.

List_of_selfie-related_injuries_and_deaths#Selfies_of_injuries[edit]

Please discuss your restoration of the edits to this article at List_of_selfie-related_injuries_and_deaths#Selfies_of_injuries Meters (talk) 23:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about new RFC[edit]

Because you have participated in a previous RFC on a closely related topic, I thought you might be interested in participating in this new RFC regarding Donald Trump.Anythingyouwant (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priceonomics (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is essentially overall an advertisement in that it focuses too closely with puffery; if you asked me how to improve it, I would say that improvements would not help because it's also then too soon for the company considering it's still new. Although, yes, the listed sources are from known news websites, that in itself is not enough for automatic inherited notability; even examining this has not found the needed substance and convincing for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priceonomics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Priceonomics has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priceonomics. Thanks! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Priceonomics[edit]

Hello, Fiachaire. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Priceonomics".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]