User talk:Fidelove/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	:) Fidelove (talk) 19:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

This is for me <3

Fidelove (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Fidelove (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Fidelove (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Economy of Jordan. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Mariah Carey

Hi Fidel. Thank you for your message. I don't know whether Mariah Carey is Hispanic or not. Good luck with your translation. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Easy there. I'm an administrator on the English-language Wikipedia. I can't delete pages on the Arabic Wikipedia. Sorry. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Admins

Hi. You should read WP:Administrators. To become an administrator, you should have a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, a good editing history, and a good reputation among your fellow editors. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay Thanks! and I hope I didn't bother sending this massage :) Sincerely Yours

No bother at all. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Lebanon

Hi Fidel. I reviewed the page history of Lebanon and I don't see enough vandalism to justify page protection. Please let me know if the situation gets worse. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Lebanese people, Religion in Lebanon

Hi Fidel. I don't see any recent vandalism in either article. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

user page

Hi Fidel, thanks for you message. As you experiment more around here you'll learn more about templates and transclusions; This is why you probably didn't find the source code for the menu at the top of my user page. I will let you discover how to transclude templates on your own, this how you learn best. As for the menu bars such as this one all you need is building blocks (graphics) and cement (wikimarkup). you can start by imitating codes and experimenting. It takes trial and error to learn these stuff, so take it easy Eli + 15:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Fidelove. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 17:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Fidelove. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Lebanon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caucasians, Kurdish and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

HI

Fixed. Don't know if that particular one will stay though. :) Teammm ^talk
_email 01:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please don't

I don't appreciate you coming onto my page trying to make out you are better than me and my edits are wrong, when in fact you are changing things into something that is not backed up. What's even more annoying is that you are moaning at me to add a source when the information you are changing in the opening of the "Unapologetic" article does not match the rest of the article.

Also, I see that you are being very unprofessional with other users too:

"Undid revision 524613094 by Cobbie98 (talk) provide a link to support your claim... Vandal !) (undo)"

Don't just label someone a "VANDAL!" it's rude and intimidating. You only had to undo the revision and give a reason, not start name calling. Plus, you can hardly call someone this when, like I said, you are editing information into such that doesn't match a citation. Iluvrihanna24 (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Easy there! why so defensive! don't take such think any personal :) . Metacritic is only one criterion for rating Unapologetic its not the only primary source to indicate that it has favorable reception! It has a mixed reception ! Praising the songs production, while criticizing her vocals! Yeah it is a VANDAL considered from the USER Cobbie98 stating that it topped the UK chart without providing any cited link ! Again I Insist, this page should not be written from a "FANS PERSPECTIVE" and I'll publicize this RIGHT NOW!

Fidelove☺</fontwhispers 1:58 AM, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Unapologetic

Hi Fidelove. I removed the banner, here's why. It's not that that the article is written from a fan point, look at the main source for the reception Metacritic says that the album has "generally favorable reviews" based on 16 critic reviews. See, that's not invented. So I suggest you not going in any other fan edit wars. Cheers!— Tomíca^(T2ME) 10:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Mariah Carey discography

1, 2, 3. Done. For Queenriah. Teammm ^talk
_email 21:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Almost Home (Mariah Carey Song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Music Barnstar!

		The Barnstar of Music
		Awarded to Fidelove for his extraordinary work on articles dealing with Mariah Carey. Excellent writing! Teammm ^talk _email 19:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mariah Carey singles discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Almost Home (Mariah Carey song), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Almost Home (Mariah Carey song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Mariah Carey in history

Hi. Could you please explain on the Mariah Carey talk page what "in history" adds to the lead sentence "With the release of "Touch My Body" (2008), Carey gained her eighteenth number one single in the United States, more than any other solo artist.", before re-adding it a third time? Do you think there is any confusion about the timeframe that this statement covers? Otherwise it reads very like at needless POV emphasis on a plain statement of fact that speaks for itself. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Rafic Hariri. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:20, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

What's this?....

... Can you explain this?. Vandalism?. Please, Assume good faith. I thought that this the certified millions in USA are albums, not records. And remember to write in UPPERCASE It's rude. Regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 23:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

... Hi, adding an undocumented phrase stating that Madonna (entertainer) is the biggest selling female artist in the history of the United States without siting a reliable resource is considered a vandalism since RIAA cited that she's 2nd to Barbara Steirsand. Using the UPPERCASE means you should'v understood from the very first time! if not! YOUR PROBLEM! Cheers. Fidel 02:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Okay, the version in the article, said that were [more] 80 million "records", not albums. And the other thing: You fixed it, but you placed that it was 64.5 million "records", when are only albums. It is totally ironic. Do not you think?. In RIAA.com the central main title says "TOP SELLING ARTISTS" and in the left says "TOP ARTISTS (ALBUMS)". Therefore, it is only certified sales of albums (Madonna = 64.5), not of "records" (when you put are "records" = 64.5). I do not mean for me, but I'll give you some advice: do you must be able to identify vandalism (The real vandalism, not a erratum.), and, above all, stop writing in UPPERCASE, which is always a lack of respect..... Please, I remember you read, Wikipedia:Assume good faith and WP:COMMONSENSE. Regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

This is improper....

This is so difficult. Maybe it's because my English is not advanced enough. You have misunderstood me completely, and you keep presuming bad faith on your part and you are not recognizing what is vandalism.

I am not trying to say that we should put that Madonna has sold more than 80 million records in the United States. I only emphasized it once again because it was the version of the article from before you and I contributed. What I wanted to make clear was your error of writing that Madonna had sold 64.5 millon "records" (with this edition= Madonna sold 64.5 million RECORDS. (overall ALBUMS + SINGLES), when it was only about albums. But anyway, I already fixed it (you check in RIAA.com that the central main title says "TOP SELLING ARTISTS" and in the left says "TOP ARTISTS (ALBUMS)" ). Now, Did you clear the reason for my message?.

Finally, if you continue to talk inappropriately and in all capitals, I will have to write up a complaint. It is worrying, because maybe you have already behaved this way towards newcomers, assuming bad intent of edits that were simply typos (or erratums), not vandalism. Please be civil. Regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 01:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

... I need a proof otherwise I have to move Madonna's article to COMPLETE protection. Fidel 01:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC) The RIAA does not deal in sales of albums, only certifications of shipped units. Therefore this best-selling list is based on total accumulated certifications given per artist and may not reflect the true physical sales obtained by these artists. The RIAA began its certifications in 1958. This list; therefore, excludes artists like Bing Crosby whose sales in the 1930s-1950s were not certified. The list also excludes certifications of albums recorded by artists in collaboration with others as part of a singular artist or group's total.

So Madonna's claimed 80+ certified records ARE PLATINUM and GOLD certifications which I'm sure you got it from best-selling music artists article ... Mariah Carey got 90+ MILLION CERTIFICATION more than any other female artist that doesn't mean she has sold 90+ million record. regards. Fidel 01:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

This is a waste of time for me............................ I never wrote that Madonna had sold 80 million records (you say this: you got it from best-selling music artists article). I already explained to you that I agree with using the RIAA as reference and The official RIAA website clearly says 64.5 million ALBUMS sold, not records (TOP SELLING ARTISTS in center and in left say TOP ARTISTS (ALBUMS)). Furthermore, there are no edit wars, and protection is really not necessary, especially since it is set only by administrators (which we are not). What is the misunderstanding here?". Regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 01:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Feud is over. :) If you believe Madonna outsold Barbra Stiersand go to the talk page of Madonna and follow the steps of the administrator :) ^_^ Fidel 01:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Lol, of course, Madonna has not sold more that Barbra Streisand. All this time I commented on this your edition that Madonna have 64,5 million albums (not 64,5 million records) with as Mariah Carey: with 63.5 million certified albums or Barbra 71.5 million albums sold. Regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mariah Carey albums discography. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

RE:

What editing war?. I have not been doing any editing war. Please, save this kind of comments in bad faith. I'm not fan of Madonna, Mariah, Michael Jackson, Elton John..... and other artists First of all, I'm impartial (or I try to be). Please do not come with this type of comments to my discussion. Thanks. Chrishonduras (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

First of all, what you did above at Chrisonduras' talk page was an extreme bad faith message, second of all you did not wait till consensus appeared on this matter in the talk page. Thirdly, you added a bunch of certifications from IRMA, ABPD, IFPI HK etc, which are of no concern to the discography article making the FL a fancruft. And lastly, you again inserted a bunch of dead links from NVPI which were removed lest the article gets drawn into FLR. Please stop making these unnecessary edits and wait for reason to appear. I have reverted all of your edits. Next time please ask me on my talk page or the article talk page. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Live It Up (Jennifer Lopez song)

Hi there. Just to clarify, the summer hit reference has nothing do to with how critics receive the song. Please refrain from edit warring in the future (without addressing issue first), I see you have made disruptive edits on another article, so serving out unjustified "warnings" in edit summaries to others is simply not right. Also, this may be crossing the line but I find it funny how you say that that wide prediction is from a fan point of view (even when sources like The New York Times report it!) considering your edit contributions (Mariah, Mariah..). Regards, Ar re 08:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm criticizing the term HAILED and you cannot just make a statement made up on ESTIMATIONS ..... and concerning my contributions ARE from a VERY NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW never exaggerate. regards. Fidel 08:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Please be sure to sign your posts properly with four tildes (~). I've tweaked the term "hailed", so calm down no need to type in caps. But it has been widely predicted by various sources. Neutral? Then why have they been looked upon as vandalism? Anyway, have a nice day. And please think twice before "warning". Regards, Ar re 11:48, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

R&B Charts

I am afraid you're revision at #Beautiful was incorrect. Per this article at Billboard (during the chart changes), the R&B songs chart ranks the top-25 purely R&B songs based on sales, airplay and streaming. I quote, "R&B Songs and Rap Songs will serve as 25-position distillations of the overall Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, highlighting the differences between pure R&B and rap titles in the overall, wide-ranging R&B/hip-hop field." Distillation being the key word here as it means separation. As the R&B songs chart uses the exact same methodology as the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, the R&B Chart is thus a component of the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs Chart, as the Rap Songs chart is identical as the R&B Songs Chart, just for hip-hop/rap music. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:11, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

The question of whether the R&B Chart is official or not (or whether it is produced by Billboard) is irrelevant. Please read the comment above and logically follow through the points made. It is a clear explanation from Billboard itself as to the fact that the R&B Chart is a distillation (subset/separation) of the R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. Component charts per WP:USCHARTS are not illegal or disallowed, they just don't get used if a parent chart with a wider methodology is used instead. Please do not revert, consider discussing at Talk:Beautiful (Mariah Carey song) or WP:USCHARTS if you're still not satisfied but please do not add the chart again. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

#Beautiful

Hi, component charts are not allowed in the table due to Wiki rules. They're allowed in the prose, though.

Digital songs, radio songs all make the Hot 100, so they're not allowed.

Anything that goes into making a chart.

Jayy008 (talk) 12:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Here's a link to the rules: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Record_charts#Dependent_.28.22component.22.29_charts Jayy008 (talk) 12:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay thanks for clearing it ! I' totally understand it now! thanks but what about the Adult Pop Songs ?Fidel 12:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

In my opinion it was a component chart, as it makes the overall Pop Songs? But I'm not sure on it entirely. I'll bring it up for discussion on that Beautiful talk page and get somebody else's opinion as I haven't edited in a while. Jayy008 (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, please do not remove "international" from the Korean chart as they are different charts. The song charted at #3 on International and #151 on the main chart. Jayy008 (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

its recommended to add International to the Gaon Chart tag instead of South Korean International Chart. Fidel 05:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outta My Head (Leona Lewis song)

Please comment. — AARON • ^TALK 21:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

what happened to this page? Fidel 05:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Invalid source for Beautiful (Mariah Carey song)

This is what it says in the "Chart performance" section:

"#Beautiful" debuted on the Adult Contemporary chart at number 23 and on the Adult Pop Songs chart at number 35.
It debuted at number 22 on the Pop Songs chart.

The source that is cited for both of these statements (as well as in the chart table) is http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/1562282/macklemore-ryan-lewis-hold-atop-hot-100. Please show me where in that article it mentions the chart positions on these 3 charts. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

it is regards Fidel 08:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

It is what? That's no more valid than the Billboard source. Where does it confirm #23 on Adult Contemporary, #35 on Adult Pop Songs, and #22 on Pop Songs? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

European Hot 100 Singles

The European Hot 100 Singles or European Hot 100 (as it was known), was a pan-European chart composed by ranking the tallies from 16 national charts within Europe. It was published by Billboard who officially discontinued the chart in December 2010, as per here. Please do not re-add the chart from any other source because Billboard was the primary reliable source for that chart and now that it has been discontinued we cannot guarantee the other websites have published the chart using the same methodology. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 10:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

thank you for making it clear enough, and sorry for the inconvenience :) Fidel 10:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beautiful (Mariah Carey song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Make it Happen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Beautiful music video screenshot.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beautiful music video screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, we'll discuss the photo caption for the Music video on the talk page you suggested. Fidel 21:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as We Can't Stop, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For moe information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

This song has been released only for 2 days now it had reviews from Billboard and some other Music critic cites and is having massive download sales on Worldwide iTunes so sure it will have a big chart debut !!! Its so early to say its not notable !!!!! Fidel 21:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Beautiful (Mariah Carey song). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I was trying to revert it in order to add another accurate link, but the link I added was blocked my Wikipedia so It wasn't my full mistake to do, charly100.com is a blog and didn't allow me to enter the accurate peak on the Croatian Airplay Chart which is 29 Fidel 06:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

For "WCS" this is nothing compared to this. For MC, this is the official chart, and this is just the ranking of a radio station. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beautiful (Mariah Carey song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beautiful (Mariah Carey song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beautiful (Mariah Carey song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

!scope="row"| Canada ([[Billboard.biz|Canadian CHR/Top 40 Airplay]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/biz/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful

I'm saying this the last time here, either stop adding charts of single retailer and charts which do not list at WP:GOODCHARTS, else I have to report this. Each and every time we have to come and undo your personal chart addition. Consider this your last warning. I tried assuming much good faith, however, I'm seeing no improvement on your part to understand the policies and guidelines. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

There is no War from the Beginning to make this as the last warning, Radio Mix FM Lebanon is the OFFICIAL LEBANESE RADIO Airplay chart, The official Lebanese TOP 20 is also counted on many other songs, PS: MIX FM is not a Single Retailer it has been launched since 1996 to it the article Mix FM Lebanon article and check the year end #1's since 1996. ITS OFFICIAL not a single unreliable retailer okay? Fidel 17:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Chart edit warring

I've noticed you including several charts that violate our chart guidelines (the Lebanon chart violates WP:SINGLENETWORK, for example, and the Hot 100 Brazil is listed at WP:BADCHARTS). Worse yet, you've been edit warring your additions despite having them removed by editors that point you at the guidelines. If I see this behaviour continue, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 17:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Whoah, thanks a lot i didn't knew about banned charts :) thanks for making it clear. :) Fidel 17:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Loverboy (Mariah Carey song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful (Mariah Carey song)

Please note that component charts (such as airplay charts) are usually removed when songs have charted on the main chart. Widr (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mariah Carey singles discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mariah Carey singles discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s and 11 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)