User talk:FigTenne

CS1 error on Daniel Lifshitz[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Daniel Lifshitz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. I corrected the error. FigTenne (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mika Tosca. Please also review the contentious topics notices that were recently placed on your talk page. And please also note there is a discussion happening at Talk:Mika Tosca about this contentious content. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An important note here. As you lack extended confirmed status, you cannot make edits that are part of the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area on any page, except for edit requests. To be clear, this includes any talk page discussions. This would apply to pretty much all your edits at Mika Tosca and the talk page. Note also, while edit requests are allowed, the edits you are trying to make are already the subject of discussion and dispute so therefore are not something that can be made in response to an edit request. Instead they can only be made after the consensus of extended confirmed editors. So there's really nothing more for you to do relating to that particular issue. If you continue to make such edits, you might be subject to sanction to stop you making such edits. If there is anything about Tosca that doesn't relate to the conflict you could participate in that discussion or make those edits, however I'd urge strong caution. As you're aware of the requirements, it's your responsibility to ensure your edits comply. There are many, many areas of Wikipedia which are well away from the conflict you can participate in instead if you're having trouble recognising when something crosses the line. As I'm on wikibreak for at least the next few weeks, if you need further help I'd suggest you seek help at the WP:Help Desk or WP:Teahouse or from one of the other editors who made it here to your talk page. Nil Einne (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mika Tosca, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]